Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4 09/10] ext4: Move CONFIG_UNICODE defguards into the code flow

[Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>]

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 03:31:45PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Instead of a bunch of ifdefs, make the unicode built checks part of the
> code flow where possible, as requested by Torvalds.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/ext4.h  | 39 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  fs/ext4/namei.c | 15 ++++++---------
>  fs/ext4/super.c |  4 +---
>  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 93a28fcb2e22..e3c55a8e23bd 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -2725,11 +2725,17 @@ extern unsigned ext4_free_clusters_after_init(struct super_block *sb,
>  					      struct ext4_group_desc *gdp);
>  ext4_fsblk_t ext4_inode_to_goal_block(struct inode *);
>  
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNICODE)
>  extern int ext4_fname_setup_ci_filename(struct inode *dir,
> -					 const struct qstr *iname,
> -					 struct ext4_filename *fname);
> +					const struct qstr *iname,
> +					struct ext4_filename *fname);

I think this function should just have a !CONFIG_UNICODE stub that does nothing,
so that the callers can just call it unconditionally and not have to gate their
call on CONFIG_UNICODE themselves.

- Eric


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel