linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: skip adding a discard command if exists
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 09:41:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZVel0bHLlg4IizJ_@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <236866a2-41b0-2ad0-db77-4c377367c80e@kernel.org>

On 11/15, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2023/11/15 10:45, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 11/15, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > On 2023/11/15 5:24, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > When recovering zoned UFS, sometimes we add the same zone to discard multiple
> > > > times. Simple workaround is to bypass adding it.
> > > 
> > > What about skipping f2fs_bug_on() just for zoned UFS case? so that the check
> > > condition can still be used for non-zoned UFS case.
> > 
> > Hmm, I've never seen this bug_on before, but even this really happens, it does
> 
> I've never seen it was been triggered as well.
> 
> > not make sense to move forward to create duplicate commands resulting in a loop.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> It looks those codes were copied from extent_cache code base, do we need to fix
> all cases to avoid loop?

Not sure other cases yet.. let's do one by one, since I hit this in real.

> 
> > 
> > So, the question is, do we really need to check this? Have we hit this before?
> Not sure, just be worry about that flaw of newly developed feature can make
> code run into that branch.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >    fs/f2fs/segment.c | 3 ++-
> > > >    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > > index 727d016318f9..f4ffd64b44b2 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > > @@ -1380,7 +1380,8 @@ static void __insert_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > >    			p = &(*p)->rb_right;
> > > >    			leftmost = false;
> > > >    		} else {
> > > > -			f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
> > > > +			/* Let's skip to add, if exists */
> > > > +			return;
> > > >    		}
> > > >    	}


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-17 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-14 21:24 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: skip adding a discard command if exists Jaegeuk Kim
2023-11-15  1:05 ` Chao Yu
2023-11-15  2:45   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2023-11-15  6:28     ` Chao Yu
2023-11-17 17:41       ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2023-11-20  3:19         ` Chao Yu
2023-11-30 18:30 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZVel0bHLlg4IizJ_@google.com \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).