From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to update user block counts in block_operations()
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:53:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZnmylaqsdF65PVDp@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240606095451.4088735-1-chao@kernel.org>
On 06/06, Chao Yu wrote:
> Commit 59c9081bc86e ("f2fs: allow write page cache when writting cp")
> allows write() to write data to page cache during checkpoint, so block
> count fields like .total_valid_block_count, .alloc_valid_block_count
> and .rf_node_block_count may encounter race condition as below:
>
> CP Thread A
> - write_checkpoint
> - block_operations
> - f2fs_down_write(&sbi->node_change)
> - __prepare_cp_block
> : ckpt->valid_block_count = .total_valid_block_count
> - f2fs_up_write(&sbi->node_change)
> - write
> - f2fs_preallocate_blocks
> - f2fs_map_blocks(,F2FS_GET_BLOCK_PRE_AIO)
> - f2fs_map_lock
> - f2fs_down_read(&sbi->node_change)
> - f2fs_reserve_new_blocks
> - inc_valid_block_count
> : percpu_counter_add(&sbi->alloc_valid_block_count, count)
> : sbi->total_valid_block_count += count
> - f2fs_up_read(&sbi->node_change)
> - do_checkpoint
> : sbi->last_valid_block_count = sbi->total_valid_block_count
> : percpu_counter_set(&sbi->alloc_valid_block_count, 0)
> : percpu_counter_set(&sbi->rf_node_block_count, 0)
> - fsync
> - need_do_checkpoint
> - f2fs_space_for_roll_forward
> : alloc_valid_block_count was reset to zero,
> so, it may missed last data during checkpoint
>
> Let's change to update .total_valid_block_count, .alloc_valid_block_count
> and .rf_node_block_count in block_operations(), then their access can be
> protected by .node_change and .cp_rwsem lock, so that it can avoid above
> race condition.
>
> Fixes: 59c9081bc86e ("f2fs: allow write page cache when writting cp")
> Cc: Yunlei He <heyunlei@oppo.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> index 66eaad591b60..010bbd5af211 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> @@ -1298,6 +1298,12 @@ static int block_operations(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> * dirty node blocks and some checkpoint values by block allocation.
> */
> __prepare_cp_block(sbi);
> +
> + /* update user_block_counts */
> + sbi->last_valid_block_count = sbi->total_valid_block_count;
> + percpu_counter_set(&sbi->alloc_valid_block_count, 0);
> + percpu_counter_set(&sbi->rf_node_block_count, 0);
Need to add this in __prepare_cp_block()?
> +
> f2fs_up_write(&sbi->node_change);
> return err;
> }
> @@ -1575,11 +1581,6 @@ static int do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
> start_blk += NR_CURSEG_NODE_TYPE;
> }
>
> - /* update user_block_counts */
> - sbi->last_valid_block_count = sbi->total_valid_block_count;
> - percpu_counter_set(&sbi->alloc_valid_block_count, 0);
> - percpu_counter_set(&sbi->rf_node_block_count, 0);
> -
> /* Here, we have one bio having CP pack except cp pack 2 page */
> f2fs_sync_meta_pages(sbi, META, LONG_MAX, FS_CP_META_IO);
> /* Wait for all dirty meta pages to be submitted for IO */
> --
> 2.40.1
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-24 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-06 9:54 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to update user block counts in block_operations() Chao Yu
2024-06-24 17:53 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2024-06-25 1:14 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZnmylaqsdF65PVDp@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).