From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65EFBC07E96 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 01:17:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 250EE61107; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 01:17:38 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 250EE61107 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1m0wC0-00060L-E3; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 01:17:36 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1m0wBy-00060A-KB for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 01:17:34 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Ke5AngDjghe8WiGQ72PKEoyeAiTnSrYyO8+yujFuEog=; b=Jkopo1BolxwHRCzeWFnljhIWle MrqCk+OuCGts3lwmNutAj6uaseepS7OuLl5TO+ydt6IR6Gl+q8FDimQMGDVpOCuBXGtRcd/D57PF4 mUOEQC5Vo64vU6i52LHsyHzKevb/J5KvJyGJx9PzzknYQXGxynoQ95lDuIuCSLWyCrN0=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Ke5AngDjghe8WiGQ72PKEoyeAiTnSrYyO8+yujFuEog=; b=I79IGzcIGm97Uz2uGmEPuO1A5r vfpKFSeVMeG9FCYLSlQ+l60hK757zq3ze+6akF63x0qGq/3ov1bHFUMy2u5jiHj/2TRgyPtHqos+L rW4YJPnA+lqiWTqYsK+Aj8XSCWBI2HaGbdGWgC/BwUzeSvpxsRVm90D/NogQfMFjygL8=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-2.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) id 1m0wBt-0003Zj-IF for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 01:17:34 +0000 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 827FA61107; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 01:17:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1625620644; bh=tbbA16pYRiAn75mbYnyj7BJIyemqqOFcxocfzHvUyt0=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=RSlXt0OwSGhPut4OopmdlRg+TIf4sPPatje+qum6B2kp3VP9Qiw1MtXPePXTZ6RSg Q2MHgC+xF1fQm1mnnUzfsduRfznzZiqP2o1m76aiYnq4ld4EoKVGdCnSEH539hCnjp wKeig6/lSZwzPxF5FK0qSsygQMPWi0VmyH0xOsQ2ALt1BNoX8cI7HAjb1oMHJ1SMAs lrfpQ82jBUA3na/tWq8JS7eD19xImMd8w8SPHzS0Nih6VAfe999feaRBgAM048/tae xwbwpar1wuul20MLVFdG4Cn3KoVvjl1m3EkPZZiAWKgE2B07Xg37/oYnv9+T+lojPE 7WBkfWiZqTGSQ== To: Wang Xiaojun , jaegeuk@kernel.org References: <20210706131008.1299060-1-wangxiaojun11@huawei.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 09:17:22 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210706131008.1299060-1-wangxiaojun11@huawei.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Headers-End: 1m0wBt-0003Zj-IF Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs-tools: fix wrong value of reserve_new_block parameter in page_symlink X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2021/7/6 21:10, Wang Xiaojun wrote: > In page_symlink, reserve_new_block applies address for data block, > not for inodes. Therefore, is_inode is set to 0. Good catch! > > Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaojun Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Thanks, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel