From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Wu Bo <wubo.oduw@gmail.com>, Wu Bo <bo.wu@vivo.com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/1] f2fs: fix fallocate failed under pinned block situation
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 12:49:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a69b7544-2312-486c-d655-8b86e370c55e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <670ce4a6-f00c-dbe9-86e2-366311221cf3@gmail.com>
On 2023/11/8 21:48, Wu Bo wrote:
> On 2023/11/7 22:39, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2023/10/30 17:40, Wu Bo wrote:
>>> If GC victim has pinned block, it can't be recycled.
>>> And if GC is foreground running, after many failure try, the pinned file
>>> is expected to be clear pin flag. To enable the section be recycled.
>>>
>>> But when fallocate trigger FG_GC, GC can never recycle the pinned
>>> section. Because GC will go to stop before the failure try meet the
>>> threshold:
>>> if (has_enough_free_secs(sbi, sec_freed, 0)) {
>>> if (!gc_control->no_bg_gc &&
>>> total_sec_freed < gc_control->nr_free_secs)
>>> goto go_gc_more;
>>> goto stop;
>>> }
>>>
>>> So when fallocate trigger FG_GC, at least recycle one.
>>
>> Hmm... it may break pinfile's semantics at least on one pinned file?
>> In this case, I prefer to fail fallocate() rather than unpinning file,
>> in order to avoid leaving invalid LBA references of unpinned file held
>> by userspace.
>
> As f2fs designed now, FG_GC is able to unpin the pinned file.
>
> fallocate() triggered FG_GC, but can't recycle space. It breaks the
> design logic of FG_GC.
Yes, contradictoriness exists.
IMO, unpin file by GC looks more dangerous, it may cause potential data
corruption w/ below case:
1. app pins file & holds LBAs of data blocks.
2. GC unpins file and migrates its data to new LBAs.
3. other file reuses previous LBAs.
4. app read/write data via previous LBAs.
So I suggest to normalize use of pinfile and do not add more unpin cases
in filesystem inner processes.
>
> This issue is happened in Android OTA scenario. fallocate() always
> return failure cause OTA fail.
Can you please check why other pinned files were so fragmented that f2fs_gc()
can not recycle one free section?
Thanks,
>
> And this commit changed previous behavior of fallocate():
>
> Commit 2e42b7f817ac ("f2fs: stop allocating pinned sections if EAGAIN
> happens")
>
> Before this commit, if fallocate() meet this situation, it will trigger
> FG_GC to recycle pinned space finally.
>
> FG_GC is expected to recycle pinned space when there is no more free
> space. And this is the right time to do it when fallocate() need free
> space.
>
> It is weird when f2fs shows enough spare space but can't fallocate(). So
> I think it should be fixed.
>
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>
>>> This issue can be reproduced by filling f2fs space as following layout.
>>> Every segment has one block is pinned:
>>> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-----+-+
>>> | | |p| | | | ... | | seg_n
>>> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-----+-+
>>> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-----+-+
>>> | | |p| | | | ... | | seg_n+1
>>> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-----+-+
>>> ...
>>> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-----+-+
>>> | | |p| | | | ... | | seg_n+k
>>> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-----+-+
>>>
>>> And following are steps to reproduce this issue:
>>> dd if=/dev/zero of=./f2fs_pin.img bs=2M count=1024
>>> mkfs.f2fs f2fs_pin.img
>>> mkdir f2fs
>>> mount f2fs_pin.img ./f2fs
>>> cd f2fs
>>> dd if=/dev/zero of=./large_padding bs=1M count=1760
>>> ./pin_filling.sh
>>> rm padding*
>>> sync
>>> touch fallocate_40m
>>> f2fs_io pinfile set fallocate_40m
>>> fallocate -l 41943040 fallocate_40m
>>>
>>> fallocate always fail with EAGAIN even there has enough free space.
>>>
>>> 'pin_filling.sh' is:
>>> count=1
>>> while :
>>> do
>>> # filling the seg space
>>> for i in {1..511}:
>>> do
>>> name=padding_$count-$i
>>> echo write $name
>>> dd if=/dev/zero of=./$name bs=4K count=1 > /dev/null 2>&1
>>> if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
>>> exit 0
>>> fi
>>> done
>>> sync
>>>
>>> # pin one block in a segment
>>> name=pin_file$count
>>> dd if=/dev/zero of=./$name bs=4K count=1 > /dev/null 2>&1
>>> sync
>>> f2fs_io pinfile set $name
>>> count=$(($count + 1))
>>> done
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wu Bo <bo.wu@vivo.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/f2fs/file.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
>>> index ca5904129b16..e8a13616543f 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
>>> @@ -1690,7 +1690,7 @@ static int f2fs_expand_inode_data(struct inode
>>> *inode, loff_t offset,
>>> .init_gc_type = FG_GC,
>>> .should_migrate_blocks = false,
>>> .err_gc_skipped = true,
>>> - .nr_free_secs = 0 };
>>> + .nr_free_secs = 1 };
>>> pgoff_t pg_start, pg_end;
>>> loff_t new_size;
>>> loff_t off_end;
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-11 4:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-30 9:40 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/1] f2fs: fix fallocate failed under pinned block situation Wu Bo via Linux-f2fs-devel
2023-11-07 14:39 ` Chao Yu
2023-11-08 13:48 ` Wu Bo
2023-11-11 4:49 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2023-11-16 23:34 ` Wu Bo
2023-11-28 6:22 ` Chao Yu
2023-11-28 12:51 ` Wu Bo
2023-12-09 9:46 ` Chao Yu
2023-12-10 12:55 ` Wu Bo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a69b7544-2312-486c-d655-8b86e370c55e@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=bo.wu@vivo.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wubo.oduw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).