Linux-f2fs-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs_io: measure readdir/stat performance
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 14:23:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aHUS707ARshL30gq@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250714115437.237151-1-chao@kernel.org>

On 07/14, Chao Yu wrote:
> - mkdir dir
> - f2fs_io test_lookup_perf -i /mnt/f2fs/dir 50000
> - sync
> - echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> - f2fs_io test_lookup_perf /mnt/f2fs/dir
> 
> Output:
> Measure readdir performance
> Measure stat performance
> Operation: total_files, total_time_s, throughput_files_per_sec
> readdir: 50000, 1.7781, 28120.08
> stat: 50000, 2.1665, 23079.19
> 
> - f2fs_io test_lookup_perf -v /mnt/f2fs/dir 50000
> 
> Output:
> inode    file type  d_reclen  d_off    d_name
> 6176     directory  24        1        .
> 3        directory  24        2        ..
> 6276     regular    32        4        test_file_0
> 6285     regular    32        6        test_file_1
> 6291     regular    32        8        test_file_2
> 6295     regular    32        10       test_file_3
> ....
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> ---
> v3:
> - add doc entry
> - fix parameter in usage description

Please post another patch, as I already merged to master.

>  man/f2fs_io.8           |   3 +
>  tools/f2fs_io/f2fs_io.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 153 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/man/f2fs_io.8 b/man/f2fs_io.8
> index e0f659e..0d69b5f 100644
> --- a/man/f2fs_io.8
> +++ b/man/f2fs_io.8
> @@ -184,6 +184,9 @@ Get i_advise value and info in file
>  .TP
>  \fBioprio\fR \fI[hint] [file]\fR
>  Set ioprio to the file. The ioprio can be ioprio_write.
> +.TP
> +\fBtest_lookup_perf\fR \fI[-i] [-v] <dir> <num_files>\fR
> +Measure readdir/stat speed
>  .SH AUTHOR
>  This version of
>  .B f2fs_io
> diff --git a/tools/f2fs_io/f2fs_io.c b/tools/f2fs_io/f2fs_io.c
> index f6649f1..f282190 100644
> --- a/tools/f2fs_io/f2fs_io.c
> +++ b/tools/f2fs_io/f2fs_io.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@
>  #include <time.h>
>  #include <unistd.h>
>  #include <sys/xattr.h>
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +#include <dirent.h>
>  
>  #ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
>  #include <config.h>
> @@ -2237,6 +2239,153 @@ static void do_test_create_perf(int argc, char **argv, const struct cmd_desc *cm
>  	exit(0);
>  }
>  
> +#define test_lookup_perf_desc "measure readdir/stat speed"
> +#define test_lookup_perf_help						\
> +"f2fs_io test_lookup_perf [-i] [-v] <dir> <num_files>\n\n"		\
> +"Measures readdir/stat performance.\n"				\
> +"  <dir>          The target directory in where it will test on.\n"	\
> +"  <num_files>    The total number of files the test will initialize or test.\n"\
> +"  [-i]           Initialized to create files only.\n"\
> +"  [-v]           Verbose mode.\n"
> +
> +static void do_test_lookup_perf(int argc, char **argv, const struct cmd_desc *cmd)
> +{
> +	struct timespec readdir_start, readdir_end;
> +	struct timespec stat_start, stat_end;
> +	DIR *dirp;
> +	struct dirent *dp;
> +	int opt;
> +	char *dir;
> +	int num_files;
> +	bool need_initialize = false;
> +	bool verb = false;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "iv")) != -1) {
> +		switch (opt) {
> +		case 'i':
> +			need_initialize = true;
> +			break;
> +		case 'v':
> +			verb = true;
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			fputs(cmd->cmd_help, stderr);
> +			exit(1);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	argc -= optind;
> +	argv += optind;
> +
> +	if (argc != 2) {
> +		fputs("Excess arguments\n\n", stderr);
> +		fputs(cmd->cmd_help, stderr);
> +		exit(1);
> +	}
> +
> +	dir = argv[0];
> +	num_files = atoi(argv[1]);
> +
> +	if (num_files <= 0) {
> +		fprintf(stderr, "Error: Number of files must be positive.\n");
> +		exit(1);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (need_initialize) {
> +		int fd;
> +
> +		// Initialization Phase
> +		printf("Starting test: Creating %d files in %s\n", num_files, dir);
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < num_files; i++) {
> +			char path[1024];
> +
> +			snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%s/test_file_%d", dir, i);
> +
> +			fd = xopen(path, O_WRONLY | O_CREAT, 0644);
> +			if (fd < 0)
> +				exit(1);
> +			close(fd);
> +		}
> +
> +		exit(0);
> +	}
> +
> +	// Measure readdir performance
> +	printf("Measure readdir performance\n");
> +	clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &readdir_start);
> +
> +	dirp = opendir(dir);
> +	if (dirp == NULL) {
> +		perror("opendir failed");
> +		exit(1);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (verb)
> +		printf("inode    file type  d_reclen  d_off    d_name\n");
> +
> +	while ((dp = readdir(dirp)) != NULL) {
> +		if (!verb)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		printf("%-8lu %-10s %-9d %-8jd %s\n",
> +			dp->d_ino,
> +			(dp->d_type == DT_REG) ?  "regular" :
> +			(dp->d_type == DT_DIR) ?  "directory" :
> +			(dp->d_type == DT_FIFO) ? "FIFO" :
> +			(dp->d_type == DT_SOCK) ? "socket" :
> +			(dp->d_type == DT_LNK) ?  "symlink" :
> +			(dp->d_type == DT_BLK) ?  "block dev" :
> +			(dp->d_type == DT_CHR) ?  "char dev" : "unknown",
> +			dp->d_reclen, dp->d_off, dp->d_name);
> +	}
> +
> +	closedir(dirp);
> +
> +	clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &readdir_end);
> +
> +	// Measure stat performance
> +	printf("Measure stat performance\n");
> +
> +	clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &stat_start);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_files; i++) {
> +		char path[1024];
> +		struct stat st;
> +
> +		snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%s/test_file_%d", dir, i);
> +		if (stat(path, &st) != 0)
> +			die_errno("stat failed");
> +	}
> +
> +	clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &stat_end);
> +
> +	long readdir_seconds = readdir_end.tv_sec - readdir_start.tv_sec;
> +	long readdir_ns = readdir_end.tv_nsec - readdir_start.tv_nsec;
> +	double readdir_time_s = (double)readdir_seconds + (double)readdir_ns / 1000000000.0;
> +	double readdir_throughput = (readdir_time_s > 0) ? (num_files / readdir_time_s) : 0;
> +
> +	long stat_seconds = stat_end.tv_sec - stat_start.tv_sec;
> +	long stat_ns = stat_end.tv_nsec - stat_start.tv_nsec;
> +	double stat_time_s = (double)stat_seconds + (double)stat_ns / 1000000000.0;
> +	double stat_throughput = (stat_time_s > 0) ? (num_files / stat_time_s) : 0;
> +
> +	printf("Operation: total_files, total_time_s, throughput_files_per_sec\n");
> +
> +	printf("readdir: %d, %.4f, %.2f\n",
> +		   num_files,
> +		   readdir_time_s,
> +		   readdir_throughput);
> +
> +	printf("stat: %d, %.4f, %.2f\n",
> +		   num_files,
> +		   stat_time_s,
> +		   stat_throughput);
> +
> +	exit(0);
> +}
> +
>  #define CMD_HIDDEN 	0x0001
>  #define CMD(name) { #name, do_##name, name##_desc, name##_help, 0 }
>  #define _CMD(name) { #name, do_##name, NULL, NULL, CMD_HIDDEN }
> @@ -2286,6 +2435,7 @@ const struct cmd_desc cmd_list[] = {
>  	CMD(ioprio),
>  	CMD(ftruncate),
>  	CMD(test_create_perf),
> +	CMD(test_lookup_perf),
>  	{ NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0 }
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 2.49.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

      reply	other threads:[~2025-07-14 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-14 11:54 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs_io: measure readdir/stat performance Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-07-14 14:23 ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aHUS707ARshL30gq@google.com \
    --to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox