From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B805C7618F for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 01:25:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 351A22173E for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 01:25:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="QBJ/xeOl"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="ZxtxuBn9" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 351A22173E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hnYh5-0007KV-Dr; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 01:25:19 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hnYh3-0007KO-Uv for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 01:25:17 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+Z9aDvS4ylyYSXa3LsCAqt8E1EelruEAwZM4CN4+OTg=; b=QBJ/xeOlRPRfnCpLPcHmec/vhw 8ngxeGG/zFmTgEOxTgVHG0tMbzTWoWA4UiIfiDVKmYQ9Jo4v/AZacBsPak/vBBtD8wXSOoBi1ezcP KZ/qAqoIJfKZReCyXTeOag6dZ3G0yQfYMIm6ivK1jFdMWvtNDVbcapi5Ic/0PY9NAeZI=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+Z9aDvS4ylyYSXa3LsCAqt8E1EelruEAwZM4CN4+OTg=; b=ZxtxuBn9ay1dRwrM4mnDmpkDVt TllGslWbfi0mK0oAsQrPgbhDFV9xYsVQztrVbgLH0/ApEgIUCeHABgTCbjkQHW3sXkXjb8Ev5KVTE rJkadZsdcraWjqhgxH9uuUfdSXxN2RwJi2t4PjM3IyodaAWAE/tyuHRGtZRhxt5gny+A=; Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32] helo=huawei.com) by sfi-mx-3.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1hnYh1-004ABV-M1 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 01:25:17 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id A8E97EBC09FEFE43D909; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 09:25:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 09:25:03 +0800 To: Jaegeuk Kim , Chao Yu References: <20190626094813.40517-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> <7a2e35af-50ce-689d-218a-44b106408d5b@kernel.org> <20190716210857.GA5347@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 09:25:02 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190716210857.GA5347@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1hnYh1-004ABV-M1 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] fsck.f2fs: write checkpoint with OPU mode X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2019/7/17 5:08, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 07/16, Chao Yu wrote: >> Ping, > > It seems this is still breaking the tests. At some point on fault/power tests, > I hit fsck is stopped since it's missing one NAT node. > >> >> On 2019-6-26 17:48, Chao Yu wrote: >>> + ret = dev_read(buf, src << F2FS_BLKSIZE_BITS, seg_size); >>> + ASSERT(ret >= 0); >>> + >>> + ret = dev_write(buf, dst << F2FS_BLKSIZE_BITS, seg_size); >>> + ASSERT(ret >= 0); My bad, it looks seg_size is wrong, let me send v3... Thanks, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel