From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com>,
jaegeuk@kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: ning.jia@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] f2fs: avoid dead loop in function find_fsync_dnodes
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 10:33:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b74925d3-4a2f-f363-497f-00e754891fb0@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1513746212-19454-1-git-send-email-heyunlei@huawei.com>
On 2017/12/20 13:03, Yunlei He wrote:
> v4 -> v5 return err instead destory inode list for two reasons:
> i. avoid duplicated destroy inode list in function recover_fsync_data.
> ii. report an error for recovery, and set need_fsck flag
fsck can't fix this issue so far, it doesn't work even we set need_fsck flag,
would it be better to just drop last dnode with corrupted next_blkaddr and try
our best to recover fsynced data?
Thanks,
>
> Came across a dead loop in recovery like this:
>
> ......
> [ 24.680480s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597696
> [ 24.698394s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597697
> [ 24.724334s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597698
> [ 24.724334s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597698
> [ 24.724365s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597698
> [ 24.724365s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597698
> [ 24.724365s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597698
> [ 24.724395s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597698
> [ 24.724395s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597698
> [ 24.724395s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597698
> [ 24.724395s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597698
> [ 24.724426s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597698
> ......
>
> Mount process will block in dead loop and fsck can do nothing with this
> error, This patch abandon recovery if node chain is cyclical.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> index d025aa8..a535ec2 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> @@ -216,6 +216,17 @@ static int find_fsync_dnodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct list_head *head)
> return 0;
>
> page = get_tmp_page(sbi, blkaddr);
> + if (PageChecked(page)) {
> + f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_ERR, "Abandon looped node block list");
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * it's not needed to clear PG_checked flag in temp page since we
> + * will truncate all those pages in the end of recovery.
> + */
> + SetPageChecked(page);
>
> if (!is_recoverable_dnode(page))
> break;
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-25 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-20 5:03 [PATCH v5] f2fs: avoid dead loop in function find_fsync_dnodes Yunlei He
2017-12-20 21:00 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-12-21 3:45 ` heyunlei
2017-12-25 2:33 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2017-12-28 2:37 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-01-04 3:07 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b74925d3-4a2f-f363-497f-00e754891fb0@huawei.com \
--to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
--cc=heyunlei@huawei.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ning.jia@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).