From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [Bug 210745] kernel crash during umounting a partition with f2fs filesystem
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 08:44:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-210745-202145-IkBCIxovmW@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-210745-202145@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210745
--- Comment #4 from Chao Yu (chao@kernel.org) ---
(In reply to Zhiguo.Niu from comment #2)
> hi Chao,
>
> Thanks for your reply, I have checked my codebase, there is no any other
> private patches in current version.
>
> I find that local variables natvec & setvec in f2fs_destroy_node_manager may
> be inited as 0xaa and 0xaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, just like :
>
> void f2fs_destroy_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> {
> struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
> struct free_nid *i, *next_i;
> struct nat_entry *natvec[NATVEC_SIZE];
> struct nat_entry_set *setvec[SETVEC_SIZE];
>
I don't think so, natvec array will be assigned in __gang_lookup_nat_cache(),
and natvec[0..found - 1] will be valid, in "destroy nat cache" loop, we will
not access natvec array out-of-range.
Can you please check whether @found is valid or not (@found should be less or
equal than NATVEC_SIZE)?
BTW, one possible case could be stack overflow, but during umount(), would
that really happen?
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-21 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-17 6:43 [f2fs-dev] [Bug 210745] New: kernel crash during umounting a partition with f2fs filesystem bugzilla-daemon
2020-12-18 10:27 ` [f2fs-dev] [Bug 210745] " bugzilla-daemon
2020-12-21 8:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-12-21 8:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-12-21 8:44 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-210745-202145-IkBCIxovmW@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox