Linux-f2fs-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [Bug 210745] kernel crash during umounting a partition with f2fs filesystem
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 08:44:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-210745-202145-IkBCIxovmW@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-210745-202145@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210745

--- Comment #4 from Chao Yu (chao@kernel.org) ---
(In reply to Zhiguo.Niu from comment #2)
> hi Chao, 
> 
> Thanks for your reply, I have checked my codebase, there is no any other
> private patches in current version.
> 
> I find that local variables natvec & setvec in f2fs_destroy_node_manager may
> be inited as 0xaa and 0xaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, just like :
> 
> void f2fs_destroy_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> {
>       struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
>       struct free_nid *i, *next_i;
>       struct nat_entry *natvec[NATVEC_SIZE];
>       struct nat_entry_set *setvec[SETVEC_SIZE];
> 

I don't think so, natvec array will be assigned in __gang_lookup_nat_cache(),
and natvec[0..found - 1] will be valid, in "destroy nat cache" loop, we will
not access natvec array out-of-range.

Can you please check whether @found is valid or not (@found should be less or
equal than NATVEC_SIZE)?

BTW, one possible case could be stack overflow, but during umount(), would
that really happen?

-- 
You may reply to this email to add a comment.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-21  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-17  6:43 [f2fs-dev] [Bug 210745] New: kernel crash during umounting a partition with f2fs filesystem bugzilla-daemon
2020-12-18 10:27 ` [f2fs-dev] [Bug 210745] " bugzilla-daemon
2020-12-21  8:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-12-21  8:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-12-21  8:44 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-210745-202145-IkBCIxovmW@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox