linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: introduce flush_policy sysfs entry
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 14:28:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c5195d5c-5f71-4057-9522-228b48e4cd90@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aJnLXmepVBD4V2QH@infradead.org>

On 8/11/25 18:52, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2025 at 11:48:38AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> This patch introduces a new sysfs entry /sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/flush_policy
>> in order to tune performance of f2fs data flush flow.
>>
>> For example, checkpoint will use REQ_FUA to persist CP metadata, however,
>> some kind device has bad performance on REQ_FUA command, result in that
>> checkpoint being blocked for long time, w/ this sysfs entry, we can give
>> an option to use REQ_PREFLUSH command instead of REQ_FUA during checkpoint,
>> it can help to mitigate long latency of checkpoint.
> 
> That's and odd place to deal with this.  If that's a real issue it
> should be a block layer tweak to disable FUA, potentially with a quirk
> entry in the driver to disable it rather than having to touch a file
> system sysfs attribute.

Okay, it makes sense to control how FUA be handled inside block layer, so
let's drop this patch.

BTW, I suffered extremely long latency of checkpoint which may block every
update operations when testing generic/299 w/ mode=lfs mount option in qemu,
then I propose to use PREFLUSH instead of FUA to resolve this issue.

"F2FS-fs (vdc): checkpoint was blocked for 24495 ms"

I just realize that using cache=directsync option in qemu can avoid FUA hang
issue, anyway, let me test more w/ this option.

Thanks,


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-12  6:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-07  3:48 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: introduce flush_policy sysfs entry Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-08-07  5:31 ` Zhiguo Niu
2025-08-11 10:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-11 13:44   ` Bart Van Assche via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-08-12  6:39     ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-08-12  6:28   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2025-08-12  7:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-12  7:53       ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-08-12  7:59         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-12  8:22           ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c5195d5c-5f71-4057-9522-228b48e4cd90@kernel.org \
    --to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).