From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28EEC43331 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:42:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B09572080C; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:42:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="LWl8Omp+"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="XjwNlRZR" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B09572080C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jGg4l-0005bs-05; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:42:23 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jGg4h-0005be-EW for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:42:19 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=cDjvfUz1TdrHTC0GeNmX1SvfZPB9FMO63jLsxOz8TuY=; b=LWl8Omp+yRdi1aIsovVFXk14aB RSUa36PCkUdTWomSvTw4ND7mDVBwFjyCM/BqqL1D7qc6/OlLRPg4PTiCpNiuLSe5zj4PQEbFpqHRV 5NdamfhZdiid95Gn5TeQB+RbInt6hKhjNy0uUXiiqcV9P5iJKyObtXkPognyIs24ENGo=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=cDjvfUz1TdrHTC0GeNmX1SvfZPB9FMO63jLsxOz8TuY=; b=XjwNlRZRl4UerqmEmHV/8tpv2r mOLU5yLaWX4w8I9ixBm3CAHAESH4AIfbRNvQ8F1PWLR+i9t2hdwuIUNadrNS5HbC1JPUQoMn06yOc Pg7RaYJpl4stehivx0C4KBV5GPZ9MI9F5tP3IXqwQwIF6H4NH7rerRwAAdWS2xhC2fYU=; Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32] helo=huawei.com) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1jGg4e-00F1b6-Dz for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:42:19 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS412-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 53CDC440437667FA7491; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:42:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:42:07 +0800 To: Sahitya Tummala , Jaegeuk Kim , References: <1585041170-11445-1-git-send-email-stummala@codeaurora.org> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:42:06 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1585041170-11445-1-git-send-email-stummala@codeaurora.org> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1jGg4e-00F1b6-Dz Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v5] fsck.f2fs: allow fsck to fix issues with online resize due to SPO X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2020/3/24 17:12, Sahitya Tummala wrote: > Add support for new CP flag CP_RESIZEFS_FLAG set during online > resize FS. If SPO happens after SB is updated but CP isn't, then > allow fsck to fix it. > > The fsck errors without this fix - > Info: CKPT version = 6ed7bccb > Wrong user_block_count(2233856) > [f2fs_do_mount:3365] Checkpoint is polluted > > The subsequent mount failure without this fix - > [ 11.294650] F2FS-fs (sda8): Wrong user_block_count: 2233856 > [ 11.300272] F2FS-fs (sda8): Failed to get valid F2FS checkpoint > > Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Thanks, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel