From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C85FEB64DD for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 00:46:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1qHD96-0005jW-UG; Thu, 06 Jul 2023 00:46:57 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1qHD95-0005jL-JV for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 06 Jul 2023 00:46:56 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: Subject:From:References:Cc:To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=VERPLtZ41/MpnO/LfB1wKmGDvnXekWKRfPmacfxBfVQ=; b=m75EbI48s3TBrxKTOXOicz7sdG J8rEzm+pCFRgJeTISxFpyB9wyGdbDBH0rIejWEycX1MvdWaAyfNY103XjJANQqFpzxNhEUiUFnr+T 2IXP4e9PuqUPrfTV2kDh3yHn1TL6MDNlLEX3HT6i2CxQRUHH41GSjLt+mH75okNIRSAU=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:Subject:From: References:Cc:To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=VERPLtZ41/MpnO/LfB1wKmGDvnXekWKRfPmacfxBfVQ=; b=nIn2kz5r/iDfxDU+/LlMnv/Auw v+bhG4E5N8uEMHDWXsgvcyoKRbtWHvgNI+QgnEr/5L98zTxh1Cws8fyoy6gQKMueGxWA42P4znF7n yzMhVp61cH2YFBg6OOS8DNWk5+AEqNCCo7+fWPDzXN8PPsnSWasi29VzufpF2vFAEv3Y=; Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by sfi-mx-2.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.95) id 1qHD95-00007x-4r for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 06 Jul 2023 00:46:55 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89060617D7; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 00:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1787EC433C7; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 00:46:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1688604409; bh=K7XtV0MJ+Qrk4bv1eFylFG3uLMZzjyg4PV7PAJHk7Pk=; h=Date:To:Cc:References:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=Bl1SkOIpVGW6hcGbc5cMMbxqYDDiCdcSfZDOEME5PNVHWUXtVrd7PwkgRrH8kaOQe akXjeHKdJglMoNRnv49qPMCIJv6IlXXl7HTEG3HHY9vA832LkWy6dskn3Pix4zb1GN Ac8LXbPHO4oZdVnAy7WYoyqteIRAmhH1V+MjPsN4kU2ebT/yMEMDJ53iLhHRgnqlUg N5A9BopyHz1FoMhK56fICuN0So84NopPypNQSPfxVZKYDpFETLe5NnTPncOJErG0WR RgFq6/v3O1zqwbGjJeuBYGSZzHEG5oMHWKQSxdHUYj+0Wi05QlLH5m2JsVtFZTiVbX 47ZbChLsDUvyw== Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 08:46:47 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Jaegeuk Kim References: <20230613203947.2745943-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <50d5fa8c-4fe9-8a03-be78-0b5383e55b62@kernel.org> <65143701-4c19-ab66-1500-abd1162639cd@kernel.org> From: Chao Yu In-Reply-To: X-Headers-End: 1qHD95-00007x-4r Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: do not issue small discard commands during checkpoint X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2023/7/6 1:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 07/04, Chao Yu wrote: >> On 2023/7/4 18:53, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>> On 07/03, Chao Yu wrote: >>>> On 2023/6/15 0:10, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>>>> If there're huge # of small discards, this will increase checkpoint latency >>>>> insanely. Let's issue small discards only by trim. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim >>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> Change log from v1: >>>>> - move the skip logic to avoid dangling objects >>>>> >>>>> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +- >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c >>>>> index 8c7af8b4fc47..0457d620011f 100644 >>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c >>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c >>>>> @@ -2193,7 +2193,7 @@ void f2fs_clear_prefree_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, >>>>> len = next_pos - cur_pos; >>>>> if (f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) || >>>>> - (force && len < cpc->trim_minlen)) >>>>> + !force || len < cpc->trim_minlen) >>>>> goto skip; >>>> >>>> Sorry for late reply. >>>> >>>> We have a configuration for such case, what do you think of setting >>>> max_small_discards to zero? otherwise, w/ above change, max_small_discards >>>> logic may be broken? >>>> >>>> What: /sys/fs/f2fs//max_small_discards >>>> Date: November 2013 >>>> Contact: "Jaegeuk Kim" >>>> Description: Controls the issue rate of discard commands that consist of small >>>> blocks less than 2MB. The candidates to be discarded are cached until >>>> checkpoint is triggered, and issued during the checkpoint. >>>> By default, it is disabled with 0. >>>> >>>> Or, if we prefer to disable small_discards by default, what about below change: >>> >>> I think small_discards is fine, but need to avoid long checkpoint latency only. >> >> I didn't get you, do you mean we can still issue small discard by >> fstrim, so small_discards functionality is fine? > > You got the point. Well, actually, what I mean is max_small_discards sysfs entry's functionality is broken. Now, the entry can not be used to control number of small discards committed by checkpoint. I think there is another way to achieve "avoid long checkpoint latency caused by committing huge # of small discards", the way is we can set max_small_discards to small value or zero, w/ such configuration, it will take checkpoint much less time or no time to committing small discard due to below control logic: f2fs_flush_sit_entries() { ... if (!(cpc->reason & CP_DISCARD)) { cpc->trim_start = segno; add_discard_addrs(sbi, cpc, false); } ... } add_discard_addrs() { ... while (force || SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info->nr_discards <= SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info->max_discards) { It will break the loop once nr_discards is larger than max_discards, if max_discards is set to zero, checkpoint won't take time to handle small discards. ... if (!de) { de = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(discard_entry_slab, GFP_F2FS_ZERO, true, NULL); de->start_blkaddr = START_BLOCK(sbi, cpc->trim_start); list_add_tail(&de->list, head); } ... } ... Thanks, > >> >> Thanks, >> >>> >>>> >>>> From eb89d9b56e817e3046d7fa17165b12416f09d456 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>> From: Chao Yu >>>> Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 09:06:53 +0800 >>>> Subject: [PATCH] Revert "f2fs: enable small discard by default" >>>> >>>> This reverts commit d618ebaf0aa83d175658aea5291e0c459d471d39 in order >>>> to disable small discard by default, so that if there're huge number of >>>> small discards, it will decrease checkpoint's latency obviously. >>>> >>>> Also, this patch reverts 9ac00e7cef10 ("f2fs: do not issue small discard >>>> commands during checkpoint"), due to it breaks small discard feature which >>>> may be configured via sysfs entry max_small_discards. >>>> >>>> Fixes: 9ac00e7cef10 ("f2fs: do not issue small discard commands during checkpoint") >>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu >>>> --- >>>> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 4 ++-- >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c >>>> index 14c822e5c9c9..0a313368f18b 100644 >>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c >>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c >>>> @@ -2193,7 +2193,7 @@ void f2fs_clear_prefree_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, >>>> len = next_pos - cur_pos; >>>> >>>> if (f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) || >>>> - !force || len < cpc->trim_minlen) >>>> + (force && len < cpc->trim_minlen)) >>>> goto skip; >>>> >>>> f2fs_issue_discard(sbi, entry->start_blkaddr + cur_pos, >>>> @@ -2269,7 +2269,7 @@ static int create_discard_cmd_control(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) >>>> atomic_set(&dcc->queued_discard, 0); >>>> atomic_set(&dcc->discard_cmd_cnt, 0); >>>> dcc->nr_discards = 0; >>>> - dcc->max_discards = MAIN_SEGS(sbi) << sbi->log_blocks_per_seg; >>>> + dcc->max_discards = 0; >>>> dcc->max_discard_request = DEF_MAX_DISCARD_REQUEST; >>>> dcc->min_discard_issue_time = DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME; >>>> dcc->mid_discard_issue_time = DEF_MID_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME; >>>> -- >>>> 2.40.1 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> f2fs_issue_discard(sbi, entry->start_blkaddr + cur_pos, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel