From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60062C2BA2B for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 07:15:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11AF3206F9; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 07:15:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="Pza3GEDC"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="ebwtJF8v" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 11AF3206F9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jOcGg-0004mv-6Z; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 07:15:30 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jOcGe-0004mn-Qm for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 07:15:28 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=DseiJMvzr8BmRtZ280O4khRQ8+CmpZSjUdaXR8TO8Ak=; b=Pza3GEDCWsEGHydRh3AzGj0YHl jD+dDukb5OkH/8JeTz9Ie2q+09ZWcbPwdIv74EQ5hI5t8DpolMpcitfXNqCcjXqxxkfLN6n8/2EPZ daDp78yzEeaMC2VlOZDoSBy+MmZCvesPWQtlLIkmwAavE+y+AFdcVa174Gxh9rr6twYs=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=DseiJMvzr8BmRtZ280O4khRQ8+CmpZSjUdaXR8TO8Ak=; b=ebwtJF8vffBRJ7GkY5aIEr+P7/ liGLZQ87mKquVq4IU0TDi9IMKNc5+iuV4m0cPsLNNr1q3azzUQgRS8dFMjm2T+jcP6ckjdWWmAQ3b C5SumMWy3F00JyZZWTwGSXXhqeO3E8+JhFBv6Go7uZ3puHy6OqYozd/d2lget40kjR6s=; Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190] helo=huawei.com) by sfi-mx-4.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1jOcGZ-001s7b-SA for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 07:15:28 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id EF9D0294396DEF9D0493 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:15:12 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:15:10 +0800 To: Tim Walker , "linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" References: From: Chao Yu Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:15:09 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1jOcGZ-001s7b-SA Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [question] ZBC/ZAC Offline/read-only zone support X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Hi Tim, On 2020/4/15 10:54, Tim Walker wrote: >> Hi Chao Yu- > > Yes the zones can have different status, according to the spec. I don't know how many drive manufactures use those zone states - if any. I was only asking to see if I had missed Offline or Read_Only zone support when I examined the f2fs source code. I was interested in the implementation details if support had been included. Thanks! Unfortunately, that support on f2fs has not been done yet. Thanks, > > Best regards, > -Tim Walker > . > _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel