Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: allocate HOT_DATA for IPU writes

[Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>]

On 8/30/2025 4:47 AM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 08/29, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 8/28/2025 11:23 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 08/28, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>> On 8/28/25 05:52, Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel wrote:
>>>>> Let's split IPU writes in hot data area to improve the GC efficiency.
>>>>
>>>> I didn't get it, IPU may be not friendly for migrating data along w/ write in
>>>> hot area?
>>>
>>> This deals with IPU in the LFS mode.
>>
>> Okay, so, we missed to add f2fs_lfs_mode() condition, right?
> 
> Why do we need that?

As you mentioned above, this deals w/ IPU in the LFS mode. Am I missing
something?

Thanks,

> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    fs/f2fs/segment.c | 3 ++-
>>>>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>>>>> index e0f6589c6a1c..bb79dad55ac9 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>>>>> @@ -3688,7 +3688,8 @@ static int __get_segment_type_6(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>>>>>    		if (file_is_hot(inode) ||
>>>>>    				is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_HOT_DATA) ||
>>>>> -				f2fs_is_cow_file(inode))
>>>>> +				f2fs_is_cow_file(inode) ||
>>>>> +				is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_NEED_IPU))
>>>>>    			return CURSEG_HOT_DATA;
>>>>>    		return f2fs_rw_hint_to_seg_type(F2FS_I_SB(inode),
>>>>>    						inode->i_write_hint);



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel