From: Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Yongpeng Yang <monty_pavel@sina.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: fix incorrect extent flag when physical addr is NEW_ADDR in f2fs_fiemap
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 17:13:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <df7554b5-b69d-42d7-aabc-148c882de82d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260203133635.3942502-2-monty_pavel@sina.com>
FYI, there is a similar proposal previously:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20230410020724.1817150-1-chao@kernel.org
On 2026/2/3 21:36, Yongpeng Yang wrote:
> From: Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com>
>
> When the file block's address is mapped to NEW_ADDR, the extent is
> currently marked with the FIEMAP_EXTENT_UNWRITTEN flag in f2fs_fiemap().
> This flag indicates that the block has been allocated but not yet
> written to. However, NEW_ADDR indicates delayed writing, meaning the
> block has not been allocated yet. Therefore, this should be modified
> such that when a file block's address is mapped to NEW_ADDR, the extent
> is marked with the FIEMAP_EXTENT_DELALLOC flags instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 84746a06cd58..42f15fd9c68e 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -2102,7 +2102,7 @@ int f2fs_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
> size += F2FS_BLKSIZE;
> }
> } else if (map.m_flags & F2FS_MAP_DELALLOC) {
> - flags = FIEMAP_EXTENT_UNWRITTEN;
> + flags = FIEMAP_EXTENT_DELALLOC;
> }
>
> start_blk += F2FS_BYTES_TO_BLK(size);
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-04 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-03 13:36 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: fix incorrect extent flag when physical addr is NEW_ADDR in f2fs_fiemap Yongpeng Yang
2026-02-03 13:36 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: fix incorrect file address mapping when inline inode is unwritten Yongpeng Yang
2026-03-04 9:14 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-03 13:36 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: fix fiemap boundary handling when read extent cache is incomplete Yongpeng Yang
2026-02-24 3:48 ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-24 4:38 ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-27 7:44 ` Yongpeng Yang
2026-02-27 19:23 ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-27 20:41 ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-06 9:15 ` Yongpeng Yang
2026-03-19 3:38 ` Yongpeng Yang
2026-02-03 13:37 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: fix inline data not being written to disk in writeback path Yongpeng Yang
2026-03-04 9:30 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-06 8:55 ` Yongpeng Yang
2026-03-04 9:13 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2026-03-06 9:18 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: fix incorrect extent flag when physical addr is NEW_ADDR in f2fs_fiemap Yongpeng Yang
2026-03-05 19:10 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=df7554b5-b69d-42d7-aabc-148c882de82d@kernel.org \
--to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=monty_pavel@sina.com \
--cc=yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox