From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDDAC47094 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:01:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 031D1610A7; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:01:11 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 031D1610A7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrMB8-0002QO-Md; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:01:06 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrMB8-0002QI-2y for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:01:06 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=3y1uOT68vrgdKOS8GjsBScOsyQHjWE8vTtwgasjaWw0=; b=kkc/WXSmzYugXf+QQrQUf+XIj+ TfJZ2nHoWuKQb2f+vkvjrLIsBjaqfGSgxlqCYuHDpdU5G+VHiAplp8uEtF6rGkiBzUjx/07Sw28s0 DqE+Kj77tZJsZnZxCo/+XcZJGgysvmrxhMNpQWPKc7vV/gsSEJPU1B1I29kcC/sC0oCY=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=3y1uOT68vrgdKOS8GjsBScOsyQHjWE8vTtwgasjaWw0=; b=eDidciNbA6/FJHPNDP5/ct4/2H t+b06SEsP+dymfbT9zUIm9haUBqvpAL7qq2iZQZjSUQd0Zu15NO1+Kxk0LTdSEX29tOElQ+UeQmnj HR/JNcoZPbyUhc24UjG/uHmoZ+Uq8QRikn+xR+IXkta4Pv+HhAR4neMlLXzepdx0DGlA=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-2.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) id 1lrMB0-0001oa-NN for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:01:08 +0000 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7452D610A7; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:00:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1623337251; bh=wozgixq7baMQaX7zrRbfTIyBXN/uF7O+PeGlX9wdYbY=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=o/DOYe4NzSe5YXAE96Gh24erJZMo7sWYmIwikpZNa2mJ75SmQbFdFGceqI+72fjoC EEh9T9ag3L0d1eqIBiusVpsbRme0+BaKG5jRWeAgnjiNKTtOZ8Ahlckl+bwY6MVGgM zLnu2J7VajMBQaIVXAkz93zYJtpY6y2nbN9lhJkOffYTQdYlm6WUd/NfJvbHAj0Nuk IHgCQ3cYRVqvI9qHNPA0FbiSVX/t1vG2N17GyJFTpQDAX10YXJjgfKeNr2r3Tf0k7y 94fUCBXptqgkkjjaLJRWlgX5JFjv9iEsOSQUaMLZxiwzQZRkapKeXYZsaGlPwW95Vb dY0gvI1Led7iw== To: Jaegeuk Kim References: <20210525205138.2512855-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <17318ac1-19e7-dfed-35f8-65a8e325fc61@kernel.org> <53531f1e-7232-df4d-3a43-43db0e8581f1@kernel.org> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 23:00:45 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Headers-End: 1lrMB0-0001oa-NN Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] sload.f2fs: use F2FS_COMPRESS_RELEASED instead of IMMUTABLE bit X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2021/6/10 2:42, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 06/08, Chao Yu wrote: >> On 2021/6/8 0:52, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>> On 06/06, Chao Yu wrote: >>>> On 2021/5/26 4:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>>>> Let's use F2FS_COMPRESS_RELEASED to disallow writes only. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu >>> >>> Too late, as I published it in master. >> >> Oops, sorry for the delay. >> >> So does the patch "f2fs-tools: support small RO partition"? > > sload.f2fs: use F2FS_COMPRESS_RELEASED instead of IMMUTABLE bit Oh, I mean does patch "f2fs-tools: support small RO partition" be pushed as well? if so, seems I don't need to reply with the reviewed-by flag. Thanks, > >> >> Thanks, >> >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel