From: Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs@redhat.com>
To: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
f2fs <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: use list_for_each rather than list_for_each_safe, in remove_orphan_inode()
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:36:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3d2qa7gj6.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51E8F7A6.7030708@cn.fujitsu.com> (Gu Zheng's message of "Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:24:06 +0800")
Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> writes:
> As we remove the target single node, so list_for_each is enought, in order to
> clean up, we use list_for_each_entry instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 5 ++---
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> index 290db04..87f7bc2 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> @@ -237,13 +237,12 @@ out:
>
> void remove_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
> {
> - struct list_head *this, *next, *head;
> + struct list_head *head;
> struct orphan_inode_entry *orphan;
>
> mutex_lock(&sbi->orphan_inode_mutex);
> head = &sbi->orphan_inode_list;
> - list_for_each_safe(this, next, head) {
> - orphan = list_entry(this, struct orphan_inode_entry, list);
> + list_for_each_entry(orphan, head, list) {
> if (orphan->ino == ino) {
> list_del(&orphan->list);
> kmem_cache_free(orphan_entry_slab, orphan);
you have meant list_for_each_entry_safe, haven't you?
--
Nikola
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-22 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-19 8:24 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: use list_for_each rather than list_for_each_safe, in remove_orphan_inode() Gu Zheng
2013-07-22 15:36 ` Nikola Pajkovsky [this message]
2013-07-23 1:06 ` Gu Zheng
2013-07-23 7:34 ` Nikola Pajkovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3d2qa7gj6.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=npajkovs@redhat.com \
--cc=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).