From: Pawel Osciak <p.osciak@samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 03/12] s3c-fb: Separate S5PC100 and S5PV210 framebuffer
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:05:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <003d01cb19e7$39c7db50$ad5791f0$%osciak@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C2DC986.7040705@simtec.co.uk>
> Ben Dooks <ben@simtec.co.uk> wrote:
>On 28/06/10 09:08, Pawel Osciak wrote:
>> S5PC100 and S5PV210 framebuffer devices differ slightly in terms of
>> available registers and their driver data structures have to be separate.
>
>Would have been nice to note which ones changes, otherwise ok.
For this series, the difference is the existence of PRTCON and SHADOWCON
registers. There are more AFAIR. I am not sure if it'd be a good place
to list all of them though...
Best regards
--
Pawel Osciak
Linux Platform Group
Samsung Poland R&D Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-02 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-28 8:08 [PATCH v3 0/12] Various s3c-fb updates Pawel Osciak
2010-06-28 8:08 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] s3c-fb: Fix various null references on framebuffer Pawel Osciak
2010-07-02 9:51 ` Ben Dooks
2010-07-02 12:56 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] s3c-fb: Fix various null references on Pawel Osciak
2010-07-06 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] s3c-fb: Fix various null references on framebuffer James Simmons
2010-06-28 8:08 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] s3c-fb: Correct FRAMESEL1 bitfield defines for Pawel Osciak
2010-07-02 10:51 ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-28 8:08 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] s3c-fb: Separate S5PC100 and S5PV210 framebuffer Pawel Osciak
2010-07-02 11:12 ` Ben Dooks
2010-07-02 13:05 ` Pawel Osciak [this message]
2010-06-28 8:08 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] s3c-fb: Add device name initialization Pawel Osciak
2010-07-02 11:13 ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-28 8:08 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] s3c-fb: Add support for display panning Pawel Osciak
2010-06-28 11:28 ` Maurus Cuelenaere
2010-07-02 11:25 ` Ben Dooks
2010-07-02 11:33 ` Maurus Cuelenaere
2010-07-02 11:52 ` Mark Brown
2010-07-02 11:24 ` Ben Dooks
2010-07-02 13:29 ` Pawel Osciak
2010-07-04 13:50 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-06-28 8:08 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] s3c-fb: Add wait for VSYNC ioctl Pawel Osciak
2010-07-02 11:37 ` Ben Dooks
2010-07-02 14:39 ` Pawel Osciak
2010-06-28 8:08 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] s3c-fb: window 3 of 64xx+ does not have an osd_d Pawel Osciak
2010-06-28 8:08 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] s3c-fb: Add SHADOWCON shadow register locking support Pawel Osciak
2010-07-02 13:11 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] s3c-fb: Add SHADOWCON shadow register locking Ben Dooks
2010-07-02 14:45 ` Pawel Osciak
2010-06-28 8:08 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] s3c-fb: Correct window osd size and alpha register Pawel Osciak
2010-07-02 13:16 ` Ben Dooks
2010-07-02 14:53 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] s3c-fb: Correct window osd size and alpha Pawel Osciak
2010-06-28 8:08 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] s3c-fb: Protect window-specific registers during Pawel Osciak
2010-06-28 8:08 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] s3c-fb: fix section mismatch Pawel Osciak
2010-06-28 8:08 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] s3c-fb: Add support for DMA channel control on S5PV210 Pawel Osciak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='003d01cb19e7$39c7db50$ad5791f0$%osciak@samsung.com' \
--to=p.osciak@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).