From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Christopher Hoover" Subject: RE: [PATCH 2.5.68] Epson 1355 Rewrite for 2.5 Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 12:26:57 -0700 Sender: linux-fbdev-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <004001c31405$75d5e550$7900000a@bergamot> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 12-234-34-139.client.attbi.com ([12.234.34.139] helo=heavens.murgatroid.com) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19D85j-00041U-00 for ; Tue, 06 May 2003 12:27:07 -0700 In-Reply-To: Errors-To: linux-fbdev-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: 'James Simmons' Cc: geert@linux-m68k.org, linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Also please don't modify the cfb_* functions. I'm familiar with the epson > chipsets and the 16 bit access issue. I recommend you write your own > acceleration functions. In fact I really recommend you use the > hardware acceleration. I know thw epson 1385 chip I worked on had > acceleration. I wish! Unforunately there is no hardware acceleration on the 135*5*. Perhaps you are thinking of the 135*6* (and later chips like the 1385 as you say). I can cut'n'paste the necessary cfb code into epson1355fb.c, but I thought that to be a worse solution. But if you'd like, I'll do exactly that. Please let me know. I'd want to send you an acceptable patch and get this into the tree asap. -ch mailto:ch(at)murgatroid.com mailto:ch(at)hpl.hp.com ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com