linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Antonino Daplas <adaplas@pol.net>
To: fbdev <linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Portrait display mode
Date: 13 Sep 2002 01:36:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1031852214.1810.3.camel@daplas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D7FA51A.EC5A6FD5@bluewin.ch>

On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 04:18, Otto Wyss wrote: 
> > I posted a patch under the thread titled "Console Rotation" 2 days ago.
> > It should support rotation in 3 additional directions (90, 180 and 270
> > degrees).  As far as fb-based apps, they have to do the rotation on
> 
> I should have looked more closely at the messages, "Console ..." misguided me.
> 
> > their own.  XFbdev in 4.2.0 already does that.
> > 
> When the fb drivers support rotation, XFbdev doesn't need rotation anymore.
It really is just console rotation, all other fb-based apps would still
display in the standard "upright" position unless specifically written
for display rotation, such as Xfbdev. 

> 
> > Doing this in 2.4 will be trickier because of absence of support for
> > drawing primitives.  (The i810fb driver had console rotation for half a
> > year now, though)
> > 
> Does this mean I have to use 2.5 to get rotation?
I'm not sure if the patch I submitted will even be accepted.  My point
is that it's easier to do this in the 2.5 fb framework than in 2.2-2.4. 
But you can already use Xfbdev in 2.4 to rotate the display.  

> 
> > If you are interested, try the patches (apply them in the order I
> > mentioned).  http://i810fb.sourceforge.net/fb_rotate.tar.gz
> > 
> I'm currently using "aty128fb" but may be able to switch to "matroxfb". I'm also
> considering buying card with an DVI plug (hopefully without fan :-( )
> 
It depends if the driver maintainers will support the drawing
primitives.  Some may refuse not to, and that is understandable. 

Tony 




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-12 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-10 20:44 Portrait display mode Otto Wyss
2002-09-10 22:22 ` Antonino Daplas
2002-09-11  6:38   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-09-11 19:50     ` Antonino Daplas
2002-09-11 20:18   ` Otto Wyss
2002-09-12 17:36     ` Antonino Daplas [this message]
     [not found]     ` <1031850411.1810.0.camel@daplas>
     [not found]       ` <3D84D045.404EA715@bluewin.ch>
2002-09-16  3:07         ` Antonino Daplas
2002-09-17 17:50           ` Otto Wyss
2002-09-17 20:13             ` Antonino Daplas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1031852214.1810.3.camel@daplas \
    --to=adaplas@pol.net \
    --cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).