linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Antonino Daplas <adaplas@pol.net>
To: otto.wyss@bluewin.ch
Cc: fbdev <linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Portrait display mode
Date: 16 Sep 2002 11:07:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1032145647.568.29.camel@daplas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D84D045.404EA715@bluewin.ch>

On Mon, 2002-09-16 at 02:24, Otto Wyss wrote:
> Sorry if I'm looking "heavy of understandig" (translated from German) but does
> this mean that some parts are written with and some without rotation? Or does it
> mean in console mode everything is rotated if the used driver supports it? Vise
> versa X?
> 
Diagramatically, the fb-based console looks something like this:

Console -> fbcon -> fbdev -> graphics-capable hardware

Rotation is done at the fbcon layer. fbdev on the other hand is just an
abstraction of the underlying graphics hardware.  It is fbdev that is
actually used by fb-based applications, such as Xfree86.  fbdev does not
know about display orientation, but Xfbdev does, and so can fbcon.
   
> What does a rotation unter X bring as long as the console doesn't? Okay for
This is actually what triggered me to submit the patches, it is quite
disconcerting to switch from a rotated Xfree86 display to an upright
console.

> anyone only using X the Xfbdev solution might be okay, but when the fb-diver
> supports rotation Xfbdev should use this.
See above.  fbdev does not know about rotation, nor does it need to.

Tony



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-09-16  3:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-10 20:44 Portrait display mode Otto Wyss
2002-09-10 22:22 ` Antonino Daplas
2002-09-11  6:38   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-09-11 19:50     ` Antonino Daplas
2002-09-11 20:18   ` Otto Wyss
2002-09-12 17:36     ` Antonino Daplas
     [not found]     ` <1031850411.1810.0.camel@daplas>
     [not found]       ` <3D84D045.404EA715@bluewin.ch>
2002-09-16  3:07         ` Antonino Daplas [this message]
2002-09-17 17:50           ` Otto Wyss
2002-09-17 20:13             ` Antonino Daplas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1032145647.568.29.camel@daplas \
    --to=adaplas@pol.net \
    --cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=otto.wyss@bluewin.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).