From: Antonino Daplas <adaplas@pol.net>
To: otto.wyss@bluewin.ch
Cc: fbdev <linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Portrait display mode
Date: 18 Sep 2002 04:13:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1032293661.565.41.camel@daplas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D876B5C.4152DF38@bluewin.ch>
On Wed, 2002-09-18 at 01:50, Otto Wyss wrote:
> > Diagramatically, the fb-based console looks something like this:
> >
> > Console -> fbcon -> fbdev -> graphics-capable hardware
> >
> > Rotation is done at the fbcon layer. fbdev on the other hand is just an
> > abstraction of the underlying graphics hardware. It is fbdev that is
> > actually used by fb-based applications, such as Xfree86. fbdev does not
> > know about display orientation, but Xfbdev does, and so can fbcon.
> >
> What about applications compiled with GTK+ target linux-fb or similar toolsets?
> If I understand it right only the fbcon layer should be used (if possible) to be
> on the save side.
>
fbcon is text-based, so it's the same for all of them. If rotation is
needed, it has to be added at the user level. I guess DirectFB is the
best choice at the moment. Maybe you can ask the developers there for
the possibility -- directfb-dev@directfb.org.
> > > What does a rotation unter X bring as long as the console doesn't? Okay for
> > This is actually what triggered me to submit the patches, it is quite
> > disconcerting to switch from a rotated Xfree86 display to an upright
> > console.
> >
> Okay I'm not so much interested in Xfbdev than in fbcon. Can you transferred
> your code to the generic part as Geert Uytterhoeven already asked. I could help
I already did, but it's against 2.5.33. See my response to Geert. It
will only work if the driver itself uses the generic functions and has
drawing primitives. It's very preliminary since James is still
rewriting the FB framework.
> test patches against kernel 2.4.19. And what about kernel 2.5, I've read of a
> feature freeze soon?
>
In November, I think.
Tony
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts
on Hammer Technology! Open Source & Linux Developers, register now
for the AMD Developer Symposium. Code: EX8664
http://www.developwithamd.com/developerlab
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-17 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-10 20:44 Portrait display mode Otto Wyss
2002-09-10 22:22 ` Antonino Daplas
2002-09-11 6:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-09-11 19:50 ` Antonino Daplas
2002-09-11 20:18 ` Otto Wyss
2002-09-12 17:36 ` Antonino Daplas
[not found] ` <1031850411.1810.0.camel@daplas>
[not found] ` <3D84D045.404EA715@bluewin.ch>
2002-09-16 3:07 ` Antonino Daplas
2002-09-17 17:50 ` Otto Wyss
2002-09-17 20:13 ` Antonino Daplas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1032293661.565.41.camel@daplas \
--to=adaplas@pol.net \
--cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=otto.wyss@bluewin.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).