From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= Subject: Re: fbdev changes. Date: 14 Oct 2002 22:46:17 +0200 Sender: linux-fbdev-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <1034628378.1143.507.camel@tibook> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from netline-be1.netline.ch ([195.141.226.32]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 181C6Y-000638-00 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 13:46:22 -0700 In-Reply-To: Errors-To: linux-fbdev-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: James Simmons Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Fbdev development list , Linux Kernel Mailing List On Son, 2002-10-13 at 22:27, James Simmons wrote:=20 >=20 > The final changes to the fbdev layer are at hand. One of the last > changes I wanted to purpose was to create a console driectory in > drivers/video and move all console related stuff into that directory. > The next step was to move the dri stuff into that directory with the agp > code possible. The questions I have is should we move the agp code over t= o > that directory. Should the DRI code move over directly or should we move > DRI driver specific code into the same directory as the fbdev driver > directories? For example in aty directory we have all the ati framebuffer > and ATI dri code. What do you think? Wouldn't that complicate merges between the kernel and DRI CVS? At any rate, I think discussion related to the DRI should take place on dri-devel. --=20 Earthling Michel D=E4nzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf