From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= Subject: Re: Mirrored Display? Date: 16 Dec 2002 01:40:25 +0100 Sender: linux-fbdev-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <1039999225.9260.30.camel@thor> References: <200212131733.42340.kaufmann@sohard.de> <1039911076.1000.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200212151603.30592.kaufmann@sohard.de> <1039985803.1080.119.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from dclient80-218-112-135.hispeed.ch ([80.218.112.135] helo=thor) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 18NjJU-0000si-00 for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:40:55 -0800 In-Reply-To: <1039985803.1080.119.camel@localhost.localdomain> Errors-To: linux-fbdev-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: Antonino Daplas Cc: Michael Kaufmann , Linux Fbdev development list On Son, 2002-12-15 at 21:57, Antonino Daplas wrote: >=20 > User apps will always assume that the first pixel written to the > framebuffer will appear as the first pixel of the first scanline of your > display. Meaning, for apps that will always use mmap, you have to > rewrite them so they raster "right->left" instead of "left->right". >=20 > If you think about it, a hardware solution seems to be more feasible. This may be true in general, but at least for X it wouldn't be hard to add an option for mirroring via a shadow framebuffer. --=20 Earthling Michel D=E4nzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/