From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Type confusion in fbcon Date: 23 Dec 2002 13:11:43 -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1040677903.21606.0.camel@rth.ninka.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: Cc: Russell King , James Simmons , Linux Kernel List , Linux Frame Buffer Device Development On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 01:18, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > That's because originally there was no fix.line_length field, and the line > length was derived from var.xres_virtual and var.bits_per_pixel. > > With some hardware, the line length must be a multiple of 32 or 64 bits, and we > needed a way to specify that, so fix.line_length was introduced. If it was > zero, user code should fallback to the old behavior. And with some cards, the line length is constant. Ie. to get to "X, Y + 1" for a given "X, Y" you add a constant to your current frame buffer pointer. That is what fix.line_length is for right?