From: Antonino Daplas <adaplas@pol.net>
To: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Linux Frame Buffer Device Development
<linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: clipping
Date: 10 Jan 2003 18:27:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1042172016.933.136.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301092122450.5660-100000@phoenix.infradead.org>
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 05:24, James Simmons wrote:
>
> > So perhaps, a function something like this:
> >
> > void fb_clip(struct fb_fillrect *region, struct fb_fillrect *clip);
> >
> > This should not be difficult to implement, and I'll code it if everyone
> > agrees.
>
> I thought about this. Originally I did have this function but removed it.
> WHat do you think Geert?
>
> > The other option (which I don't like) is just to check the passed
> > fb_var_screeninfo in the put_var ioctl against the current console
> > window size. But this is not foolproof as we will not be sure of the
> > resulting window size _after_ the fb_set_var() call.
>
> Yuck!!! The other way is better.
>
Yes, I thought so too :-).
I think one scenario why we need clipping is changing bits_per_pixel,
ie, changing from 8->16 will drop your vyres by half and it's difficult
to determine this unless you do another check before the set_par(), as
Geert mentioned. Worse still, there is little if no valid memory past
vyres but the console thinks there is. That's where you will get a
segfault.
Whereas explicitly doing fbset -vyres 768 will not cause a segfault,
because you still have valid framebuffer memory past y=768.
Tony
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-10 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-29 21:21 clipping Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-01-03 10:36 ` clipping Antonino Daplas
2003-01-07 21:08 ` clipping Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-01-07 22:13 ` clipping James Simmons
2003-01-08 9:54 ` clipping Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-01-08 16:26 ` clipping Antonino Daplas
2003-01-09 21:24 ` clipping James Simmons
2003-01-09 21:46 ` clipping Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-01-10 13:55 ` [RESEND] clipping Antonino Daplas
2003-01-10 19:39 ` clipping James Simmons
2003-01-10 19:48 ` clipping Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-01-11 5:12 ` clipping Antonino Daplas
2003-01-10 10:27 ` Antonino Daplas [this message]
2003-01-10 10:45 ` clipping Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-01-09 21:09 ` clipping James Simmons
[not found] <1042172278.933.145.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2003-01-10 10:49 ` clipping Geert Uytterhoeven
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301102030310.30522-100000@phoenix.infradead.org>
2003-01-11 5:12 ` clipping Antonino Daplas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1042172016.933.136.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=adaplas@pol.net \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=jsimmons@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox