Re: fb_imageblit semantic

[Antonino Daplas <adaplas@pol.net>]

On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 20:18, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On 17 Mar 2003, Antonino Daplas wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 18:40, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> > > On 17 Mar 03 at 11:31, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > On 17 Mar 2003, Antonino Daplas wrote:
> > > > > As Geert said, it's not just trivial, but logical to split fb_imageblit
> > > > > into two.
> > > > 
> > > > So, are we gonna split it? This will also make hardware acceleration support
> > > > more clean. E.g. most sbus drivers do color expansion in hardware, and fall
> > > > back to cfb_imageblit() for the logo.
> > 
> > It's up to James, though I vote for it.  And I don't think any driver
> > has accelerated versions of fb_imageblit for the logo, since any
> > performance gained is probably minimal and it will involve too much work
> > for something that's going to be done only once.
> 
> Wait until someone wants 256-color fonts ;-)

When we do get that to that point, the entire interface will be
revamped.  Imagine passing 128 bytes to draw a single character.  This
is where Tile Blitting comes in.

Tony



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en