From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Torgeir Veimo Subject: Re: [patch] radeonfb: FB_WAITFORVSYNC implementation Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:03:03 +0000 Message-ID: <1110646984.5997.96.camel@atlantis.netenviron.com> References: <1110636406.5997.86.camel@atlantis.netenviron.com> <9e473391050312073314dcb39f@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DAA11-00077T-7S for linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 09:03:03 -0800 Received: from orb.pobox.com ([207.8.226.5]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1DAA0z-0006sr-PX for linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 09:03:03 -0800 Received: from orb (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orb.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6810570 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 12:03:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.18] (iampivot.plus.com [81.174.152.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by orb.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA2D8B for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 12:02:59 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <9e473391050312073314dcb39f@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-fbdev-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: linux-fbdev-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Sat, 2005-03-12 at 10:33 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote: > You can't do this without coordination from X and DRM. > Because of these issues WAITFORVSYNC in radeondb has to wait for > merged DRM/fbdev to be implemented. It's a bit hard to track the merge-dri-and-db work, so I'm basing it on mainline kernel. Is there a common repository for this work somewhere? I think it would be a good idea to settle on a common set of register locations and values. Right now the #defines names used by framebuffers differ quite a lot from those used by dri. -- Torgeir Veimo ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click