From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@gmail.com>
To: linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Console unregistration questions
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:19:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1177456787.10465.29.camel@daplas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704241459.29297.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 14:59 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> In doing the DRM modesetting work, we've been using the FB layer to manage
> regular FB devices and provide a DRM based console to the user (iow DRM
> owns the PCI device but the FB layer is used as a console and to provide
> the familiar /dev/fb interface to existing software).
>
> However, in doing development we noticed that when we remove the new DRM
> based fb driver, our machines tend to hang. This appears to be due to
> bugs in console unregistration.
>
> The DRM fb driver's cleanup routine is normal, I think:
>
> int drmfb_remove(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_framebuffer *fb)
> {
> struct fb_info *info = fb->fbdev;
>
> unregister_framebuffer(info);
> framebuffer_release(info);
> /* Unmap framebuffer */
> drm_mem_reg_iounmap(dev, &fb->bo->mem, fb->virtual_base);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> But since we're using drmfb as a console, the unregister_framebuffer call
> silently fails. fbcon is builtin to the kernel, so when drmfb exits,
> unregister_framebuffer will end up calling fbcon's fbcon_fb_unregistered()
> function via the notifier chain. However, when fbcon_fb_unregistered
> calls unregister_con_driver(&fb_con) it ignores the return value, which is
> bad since unregister_con_driver left fbcon's routines active (due to fbcon
> still being bound to the console) even while unregister_framebuffer freed
> their underlying structures.
Okay, we can do that. This was not done before because
unregister_framebuffer was only called on rmmod <module>. But checking
for the return error and have it propagate to the driver should not be a
problem.
I'll send a patch to you and to akpm soon.
> So when unregister_framebuffer returns, the
> very next console operation causes an oops or worse (I usually see
> hide_cursor->fbcon_cursor die when it tries to get at info->fbcon_par).
>
> However, it doesn't appear that there's a way for fb drivers to unbind
> themselves from the console at unload time, so we have to do it manually.
You cannot unbind framebuffer drivers independently from the console
layer because the console is holding a reference count on them.
FYI: this was what I did initially, but akpm objected :-).
> Should there be a way to unbind it from driver code? Maybe by exporting a
> wrapper to unbind_con_driver?
Yes, you can expose unbind_con_driver(), I don't mind. You can do it
first in your tree, then when you need it for mainline, let me know.
(The kernel has someone who hunts for unused EXPORT_SYMBOLs and removes
them without remorse :-)
> Also, shouldn't callers of
> unregister_con_driver be checking return values? That would have made
> this bug a lot easier to find at least. :)
>
Okay.
Tony
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-24 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-24 21:59 Console unregistration questions Jesse Barnes
2007-04-24 23:19 ` Antonino A. Daplas [this message]
2007-04-24 23:42 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-04-24 23:46 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-04-25 0:07 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-04-25 1:17 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-04-26 17:00 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-04-27 1:30 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-04-27 6:10 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-04-27 15:14 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-04-27 16:10 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-04-24 23:42 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-04-25 0:04 ` Antonino A. Daplas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1177456787.10465.29.camel@daplas \
--to=adaplas@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=wallbraker@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).