From: "Michel Dänzer" <michel@daenzer.net>
To: Prasad Joshi <prasadjoshi124@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: A query on frame buffers
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 09:00:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1294390835.6019.218.camel@thor.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim38gpvun=QwWcnwz719a2NYBcpiSvPYtgR6jMj@mail.gmail.com>
On Fre, 2011-01-07 at 02:42 +0000, Prasad Joshi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 04:51:04AM +0000, Prasad Joshi wrote:
> >> Hello All,
> >>
> >> This is probably my first mail on this mailing list. I am working on a
> >> university project on Nvidia or any GPU Pass-through in KVM. I have a
> >
> > You picking the hard ones first, eh? I would suggest you do Intel
> > or ATI as they have actually posted patches for this.
>
> Thanks a lot for your reply.
>
> Yes indeed, I started with the ATI Radeon RV370 card. Passing the
> Nvidia card is the ultimate aim of the project.
>
> >
> >> question related to framebuffer.
> >>
> >> I was reading few documents on XEN VGA pass-through, the document says
> >> the first step for pass-through is mapping the framebuffers in the VM
> >> at specific address, specifically speaking 0xA0000 till 0xC0000.
> >
> > I would suggest you look at the code - there have been some patches
> > posted by AMD engineers on xen-devel for this.
> >
>
> Yes I am looking at those patches as well, including some research
> papers on the same topic.
>
> Here is what I have tried so far.
> I have 2 graphics cards connected to my machine
> 1. Nvidia: This is being used by host machine.
> 2. ATI: Want to pass-through this card to the VM.
>
> I tried to pass-through the ATI card to VM. First, there was a problem
> with ROM BIOS. Then I passed a correct ROM BIOS to QEMU-KVM. Now when
> I start the VM with ATI card in pass-through mode.
>
> I see some garbage output on the monitor attached to the ATI card. I
> also saw following messages in the system log.
>
> [ 2.162294] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
> [ 2.459594] [drm] radeon defaulting to kernel modesetting.
> [ 2.459596] [drm] radeon kernel modesetting enabled.
> [ 2.766698] radeon 0000:00:04.0: PCI INT A -> Link[LNKD] -> GSI 10
> (level, high) -> IRQ 10
> [ 2.766734] radeon 0000:00:04.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [ 2.783512] [drm] initializing kernel modesetting (RV380 0x1002:0x5B64).
> [ 2.792407] [drm] register mmio base: 0x40000000
> [ 2.792408] [drm] register mmio size: 65536
> [ 2.797177] [drm] Generation 2 PCI interface, using max accessible memory
> [ 2.797275] radeon 0000:00:04.0: VRAM: 128M 0x00000000F8000000 -
> 0x00000000FFFFFFFF (128M used)
> [ 2.797284] radeon 0000:00:04.0: GTT: 512M 0x00000000D8000000 -
> 0x00000000F7FFFFFF
> [ 2.798370] radeon 0000:00:04.0: irq 40 for MSI/MSI-X
> [ 2.870703] radeon 0000:00:04.0: radeon: using MSI.
> [ 3.151162] [drm] radeon: irq initialized.
> [ 3.151539] [drm] Detected VRAM RAM\x128M, BAR\x128M
> [ 3.151541] [drm] RAM width 128bits DDR
> [ 3.151610] [drm] radeon: 128M of VRAM memory ready
> [ 3.151611] [drm] radeon: 512M of GTT memory ready.
> [ 3.151627] [drm] GART: num cpu pages 131072, num gpu pages 131072
> [ 3.152701] [drm] radeon: 1 quad pipes, 1 Z pipes initialized.
> [ 3.544943] [drm] PCIE GART of 512M enabled (table at 0xF8040000).
> [ 3.548479] radeon 0000:00:04.0: WB enabled
> [ 3.549020] [drm] Loading R300 Microcode
> [ 3.554278] [drm] radeon: ring at 0x00000000D8001000
> [ 3.778476] [drm:r100_ring_test] *ERROR* radeon: ring test failed
> (sracth(0x15E4)=0xCAFEDEAD)
> [ 3.781010] [drm:r100_cp_init] *ERROR* radeon: cp isn't working (-22).
> [ 3.782542] radeon 0000:00:04.0: failled initializing CP (-22).
> [ 3.784006] radeon 0000:00:04.0: Disabling GPU acceleration
> [ 3.793709] [drm] radeon: cp finalized
> [ 3.834875] radeon 0000:00:04.0: ffff8800320b4c00 unpin not necessary
> [ 3.841759] [drm] Radeon Display Connectors
> [ 3.841766] [drm] Connector 0:
> [ 3.841771] [drm] VGA
> [ 3.841777] [drm] DDC: 0x60 0x60 0x60 0x60 0x60 0x60 0x60 0x60
> [ 3.841781] [drm] Encoders:
> [ 3.841785] [drm] CRT1: INTERNAL_DAC1
> [ 3.841788] [drm] Connector 1:
> [ 3.841791] [drm] DVI-I
> [ 3.841794] [drm] HPD1
> [ 3.841799] [drm] DDC: 0x64 0x64 0x64 0x64 0x64 0x64 0x64 0x64
> [ 3.841803] [drm] Encoders:
> [ 3.841806] [drm] CRT2: INTERNAL_DAC2
> [ 3.841809] [drm] DFP1: INTERNAL_TMDS1
> [ 6.158753] [drm] fb mappable at 0xF8040000
> [ 6.158756] [drm] vram apper at 0xF8000000
> [ 6.158757] [drm] size 5242880
> [ 6.158758] [drm] fb depth is 24
> [ 6.158759] [drm] pitch is 5120
> [ 13.914196] fb0: radeondrmfb frame buffer device
> [ 13.914198] drm: registered panic notifier
> [ 13.914683] [drm] Initialized radeon 2.7.0 20080528 for
> 0000:00:04.0 on minor 0
>
> The errors
>
> [ 3.778476] [drm:r100_ring_test] *ERROR* radeon: ring test failed
> (sracth(0x15E4)=0xCAFEDEAD)
> [ 3.781010] [drm:r100_cp_init] *ERROR* radeon: cp isn't working (-22).
> [ 3.782542] radeon 0000:00:04.0: failled initializing CP (-22).
> [ 3.784006] radeon 0000:00:04.0: Disabling GPU acceleration
>
> Seem to be disabling GPU functionality. For now, I am interested in
> Graphics functionality of the ATI card and not GPGPU functionality.
>
> I will appreciate if you can help me with some information on solving
> this problem. Let me know if I should be asking this question on
> another forum. Please keep me in CC.
Looks like dri-devel material, added to CC.
As a first guess, maybe the system memory pages accessed by the GPU GART
aren't the same ones intended for this by the VM.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.vmware.com
Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-07 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-21 4:51 A query on frame buffers Prasad Joshi
2010-12-27 15:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-07 2:42 ` Prasad Joshi
2011-01-07 9:00 ` Michel Dänzer [this message]
2011-01-07 16:58 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-07 17:47 ` Prasad Joshi
2011-01-07 19:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-08 2:12 ` Prasad Joshi
2011-01-10 12:31 ` Prasad Joshi
2011-01-10 18:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-10 19:57 ` Prasad Joshi
2011-01-10 20:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-11 16:58 ` Prasad Joshi
2011-01-11 17:10 ` Alex Deucher
2011-01-11 18:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1294390835.6019.218.camel@thor.local \
--to=michel@daenzer.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prasadjoshi124@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).