From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] OMAPDSS: HACK: Ensure DSS clock domain gets out of idle when HDMI is enabled
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:15:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1329225311.1845.109.camel@deskari> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F3A5A5D.4020906@ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1182 bytes --]
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 13:58 +0100, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> Hi Tomi,
> > Benoit, do you think we'll get the MODULEMODE mess cleaned up in the
> > hwmod/clk framework at some point, and the drivers could do without
> > these kinds of hacks? =)
>
> The best way to fix that for my point of view is to go to device tree
> or/and to consider the DSS as the parent of all the DSS modules.
> pm_runtime will then always ensure that the parent is enabled before any
> of the child are used.
Ah, right. Sounds fine to me.
But is that a proper "fix"? Are we sure the MODULEMODE will then always
be handled correctly? Isn't the core problem still there, it just
doesn't happen with the setup anymore?
I mean, if we have these special requirements regarding MODULEMODE, and
the code doesn't really know about it, would it get broken easily with
restructuring/changes?
And no, I don't have any clear idea why/how it would break, but I have
just gotten the impression that the MODULEMODE is not handled quite
properly (and so we have these current problems), and having dss_core as
the parent of other dss modules doesn't really fix that in any way.
Tomi
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-14 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-10 6:27 [PATCH v2] OMAPDSS: HACK: Ensure DSS clock domain gets out of idle when HDMI is enabled Archit Taneja
2012-02-14 11:57 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-02-14 12:58 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-14 13:15 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2012-02-14 13:42 ` Archit Taneja
2012-02-14 13:33 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-02-14 13:57 ` Archit Taneja
2012-02-14 16:02 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-14 16:59 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-02-14 19:54 ` Archit Taneja
2012-02-14 15:41 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-15 12:13 ` Archit Taneja
2012-02-15 12:35 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-15 12:51 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-02-15 13:04 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-15 19:59 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-16 8:22 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-02-16 10:16 ` Cousson, Benoit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1329225311.1845.109.camel@deskari \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=archit@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).