linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
Cc: mythripk@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, andy.green@linaro.org,
	n-dechesne@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAPDSS: Check if RPM enabled before trying to change state
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 06:41:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340865706.2090.27.camel@lappyti> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJe_ZhdOiv8NgMB37h5_X_reK+urxVykW1tHDF9S50VVUvX=4g@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1934 bytes --]

On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 20:23 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On 27 June 2012 13:43, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> wrote:
> >
> > I don't like it at all that omapdss disables and enables the panels in
> > omapdss's suspend/resume hooks. But I'm not sure how this should work...
> > Should panel drivers each have their own suspend/resume hooks, and
> > handle it themselves? Or should the call to suspend/resume come from
> > upper layers, like omapfb or omapdrm.
> >
> > I made a prototype patch a few weeks ago to move the suspend to omapfb,
> > and it feels better than the current one, but I'm still not sure...
> >
> IIUC, I have similar opinion.
> Each panel having its own suspend/resume sounds like inter-dependency trouble.

What do you mean with that? If we just consider omapdss and the panel
drivers, I see no dependency trouble. Panels are independent of each
other, and omapdss is supposed to handle any locking & refcounting
related to multiple panels already, as from omapdss's point of view
panel suspend is the same as panel disable.

And if we take omapfb/omapdrm into equation, well, in any case it
couldn't be any worse than the current one where suspend is handled by
omapdss.

> I too would prefer suspend/resume propagating from omap-fb/drm, which
> imho fits better with the notion of a linux device(omapdss is only
> backend). Though I don't have strong feelings about how core then take
> various panels up/down optimally.

One one hand, I see the combination of omapdss (or the "output" side of
omapdss) and a panel as a whole entity. I mean, if you just load omapdss
and a panel driver, but no omapfb/omapdrm, you already have a working
panel. You don't _need_ omapfb/omapdrm there. And in that sense it'd
make sense if the panels did handle their own suspend/resume.

But then, in real life it may be just simpler if omapfb/omapdrm handles
the suspend.

 Tomi


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-28  6:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-23  8:18 [PATCH] OMAPDSS: Check if RPM enabled before trying to change state jaswinder.singh
2012-06-25  6:20 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-25  8:53   ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-25  9:30     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-25 12:39       ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-25 12:41         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-25 13:43           ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-25 13:49             ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-25 17:18               ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-26  7:19                 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26  8:44                   ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-26  8:40                     ` Andy Green
2012-06-26  9:07                     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26 10:09                       ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-26 12:03                         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26 14:52                           ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-26 15:08                             ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26 15:21                               ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-26 15:11                                 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26 17:13                                   ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-26 18:44                                     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-27  4:54                                       ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-27  5:58                                         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-27  7:53                                           ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-27  8:13                                             ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-27 14:56                                               ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-28  6:41                                                 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2012-06-28  7:58                                                   ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-28  7:58                                                     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-25 12:05   ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2012-06-25 12:30     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-25 12:54       ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-25 12:50         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26  4:55           ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-26 13:02             ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2012-06-26 14:34               ` Alan Stern
2012-06-26 15:01                 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26 15:11                   ` Alan Stern
2012-06-25 12:45     ` Jassi Brar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1340865706.2090.27.camel@lappyti \
    --to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    --cc=andy.green@linaro.org \
    --cc=jaswinder.singh@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mythripk@ti.com \
    --cc=n-dechesne@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).