From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Chandrabhanu Mahapatra <cmahapatra@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] OMAPDSS: DSS: Cleanup cpu_is_xxxx checks
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:48:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1344937705.2345.17.camel@deskari> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344859176-4512-1-git-send-email-cmahapatra@ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8283 bytes --]
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 17:29 +0530, Chandrabhanu Mahapatra wrote:
> All the cpu_is checks have been moved to dss_init_features function providing a
> much more generic and cleaner interface. The OMAP version and revision specific
> initializations in various functions are cleaned and the necessary data are
> moved to dss_features structure which is local to dss.c.
It'd be good to have some version information here. Even just [PATCH v3
3/6] in the subject is good, but of course the best is if there's a
short change log
> Signed-off-by: Chandrabhanu Mahapatra <cmahapatra@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.c
> index 7b1c6ac..6ab236e 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
Hmm, what is this for?
> #include <video/omapdss.h>
>
> @@ -65,6 +66,13 @@ struct dss_reg {
> static int dss_runtime_get(void);
> static void dss_runtime_put(void);
>
> +struct dss_features {
> + u16 fck_div_max;
> + int factor;
> + char *clk_name;
> + bool (*check_cinfo_fck) (void);
> +};
Is the check_cinfo_fck a leftover from previous versions?
I think "factor" name is too vague. If I remember right, it's some kind
of implicit multiplier for the dss fck. So "dss_fck_multiplier"? You
could check the clock trees to verify what the multiplier exactly was,
and see if you can come up with a better name =).
> +
> static struct {
> struct platform_device *pdev;
> void __iomem *base;
> @@ -83,6 +91,8 @@ static struct {
>
> bool ctx_valid;
> u32 ctx[DSS_SZ_REGS / sizeof(u32)];
> +
> + const struct dss_features *feat;
> } dss;
>
> static const char * const dss_generic_clk_source_names[] = {
> @@ -91,6 +101,30 @@ static const char * const dss_generic_clk_source_names[] = {
> [OMAP_DSS_CLK_SRC_FCK] = "DSS_FCK",
> };
>
> +static const struct __initdata dss_features omap2_dss_features = {
> + .fck_div_max = 16,
> + .factor = 2,
> + .clk_name = NULL,
> +};
include/linux/init.h says says __initdata should be used like:
static int init_variable __initdata = 0;
And there actually seems to be __initconst also, which I think is the
correct one to use here. Didn't know about that =):
static const char linux_logo[] __initconst = { 0x32, 0x36, ... };
> +static const struct __initdata dss_features omap34_dss_features = {
Perhaps the names could be more consistent. "omap34" doesn't sound like
any omap we have ;). So maybe just omap2xxx, omap34xx, etc, the same way
we have in the cpu_is calls.
> + .fck_div_max = 16,
> + .factor = 2,
> + .clk_name = "dpll4_m4_ck",
> +};
> +
> +static const struct __initdata dss_features omap36_dss_features = {
> + .fck_div_max = 32,
> + .factor = 1,
> + .clk_name = "dpll4_m4_ck",
> +};
> +
> +static const struct __initdata dss_features omap4_dss_features = {
> + .fck_div_max = 32,
> + .factor = 1,
> + .clk_name = "dpll_per_m5x2_ck",
> +};
> +
> static inline void dss_write_reg(const struct dss_reg idx, u32 val)
> {
> __raw_writel(val, dss.base + idx.idx);
> @@ -236,7 +270,6 @@ const char *dss_get_generic_clk_source_name(enum omap_dss_clk_source clk_src)
> return dss_generic_clk_source_names[clk_src];
> }
>
> -
> void dss_dump_clocks(struct seq_file *s)
> {
> unsigned long dpll4_ck_rate;
> @@ -259,18 +292,10 @@ void dss_dump_clocks(struct seq_file *s)
>
> seq_printf(s, "dpll4_ck %lu\n", dpll4_ck_rate);
>
> - if (cpu_is_omap3630() || cpu_is_omap44xx())
> - seq_printf(s, "%s (%s) = %lu / %lu = %lu\n",
> - fclk_name, fclk_real_name,
> - dpll4_ck_rate,
> - dpll4_ck_rate / dpll4_m4_ck_rate,
> - fclk_rate);
> - else
> - seq_printf(s, "%s (%s) = %lu / %lu * 2 = %lu\n",
> - fclk_name, fclk_real_name,
> - dpll4_ck_rate,
> - dpll4_ck_rate / dpll4_m4_ck_rate,
> - fclk_rate);
> + seq_printf(s, "%s (%s) = %lu / %lu * %d = %lu\n",
> + fclk_name, fclk_real_name, dpll4_ck_rate,
> + dpll4_ck_rate / dpll4_m4_ck_rate,
> + dss.feat->factor, fclk_rate);
> } else {
> seq_printf(s, "%s (%s) = %lu\n",
> fclk_name, fclk_real_name,
> @@ -470,7 +495,7 @@ int dss_calc_clock_div(unsigned long req_pck, struct dss_clock_info *dss_cinfo,
>
> unsigned long fck, max_dss_fck;
>
> - u16 fck_div, fck_div_max = 16;
> + u16 fck_div;
>
> int match = 0;
> int min_fck_per_pck;
> @@ -480,9 +505,8 @@ int dss_calc_clock_div(unsigned long req_pck, struct dss_clock_info *dss_cinfo,
> max_dss_fck = dss_feat_get_param_max(FEAT_PARAM_DSS_FCK);
>
> fck = clk_get_rate(dss.dss_clk);
> - if (req_pck == dss.cache_req_pck &&
> - ((cpu_is_omap34xx() && prate == dss.cache_prate) ||
> - dss.cache_dss_cinfo.fck == fck)) {
> + if (req_pck == dss.cache_req_pck && prate == dss.cache_prate &&
> + dss.cache_dss_cinfo.fck == fck) {
> DSSDBG("dispc clock info found from cache.\n");
> *dss_cinfo = dss.cache_dss_cinfo;
> *dispc_cinfo = dss.cache_dispc_cinfo;
> @@ -519,16 +543,10 @@ retry:
>
> goto found;
> } else {
> - if (cpu_is_omap3630() || cpu_is_omap44xx())
> - fck_div_max = 32;
> -
> - for (fck_div = fck_div_max; fck_div > 0; --fck_div) {
> + for (fck_div = dss.feat->fck_div_max; fck_div > 0; --fck_div) {
> struct dispc_clock_info cur_dispc;
>
> - if (fck_div_max == 32)
> - fck = prate / fck_div;
> - else
> - fck = prate / fck_div * 2;
> + fck = prate / fck_div * dss.feat->factor;
>
> if (fck > max_dss_fck)
> continue;
> @@ -633,22 +651,11 @@ static int dss_get_clocks(void)
>
> dss.dss_clk = clk;
>
> - if (cpu_is_omap34xx()) {
> - clk = clk_get(NULL, "dpll4_m4_ck");
> - if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
> - DSSERR("Failed to get dpll4_m4_ck\n");
> - r = PTR_ERR(clk);
> - goto err;
> - }
> - } else if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
> - clk = clk_get(NULL, "dpll_per_m5x2_ck");
> - if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
> - DSSERR("Failed to get dpll_per_m5x2_ck\n");
> - r = PTR_ERR(clk);
> - goto err;
> - }
> - } else { /* omap24xx */
> - clk = NULL;
> + clk = clk_get(NULL, dss.feat->clk_name);
> + if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
> + DSSERR("Failed to get %s\n", dss.feat->clk_name);
> + r = PTR_ERR(clk);
> + goto err;
> }
>
> dss.dpll4_m4_ck = clk;
> @@ -704,6 +711,26 @@ void dss_debug_dump_clocks(struct seq_file *s)
> }
> #endif
>
> +static int __init dss_init_features(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + dss.feat = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dss.feat), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!dss.feat) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate local DSS Features\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + if (cpu_is_omap24xx())
> + dss.feat = &omap2_dss_features;
> + else if (cpu_is_omap34xx())
> + dss.feat = &omap34_dss_features;
> + else if (cpu_is_omap3630())
> + dss.feat = &omap36_dss_features;
> + else
> + dss.feat = &omap4_dss_features;
Check for omap4 also, and if the cpu is none of the above, return error.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /* DSS HW IP initialisation */
> static int __init omap_dsshw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> @@ -750,6 +777,10 @@ static int __init omap_dsshw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dss.lcd_clk_source[0] = OMAP_DSS_CLK_SRC_FCK;
> dss.lcd_clk_source[1] = OMAP_DSS_CLK_SRC_FCK;
>
> + r = dss_init_features(&dss.pdev->dev);
> + if (r)
> + return r;
> +
> rev = dss_read_reg(DSS_REVISION);
> printk(KERN_INFO "OMAP DSS rev %d.%d\n",
> FLD_GET(rev, 7, 4), FLD_GET(rev, 3, 0));
> @@ -772,6 +803,8 @@ static int __exit omap_dsshw_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> dss_put_clocks();
>
> + devm_kfree(&dss.pdev->dev, (void *)dss.feat);
You don't need to free the memory allocated with devm_kzalloc. The
framework will free it automatically on unload (that's the idea of
devm_* functions).
Otherwise looks good, cleans up nicely the cpu_is_* mess.
Tomi
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-14 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-07 8:39 [PATCH 0/6] OMAPDSS: Remove cpu_is checks Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-07 8:39 ` [PATCH 1/6] OMAPDSS: DISPC: Remove cpu_is_xxxx checks Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-07 8:48 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-08-07 9:05 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-07 9:14 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-08-07 9:27 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-07 9:32 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-08-07 9:57 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-07 10:27 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-08-07 10:57 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-07 11:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-08-07 10:52 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-07 12:34 ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-07 13:00 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-08 11:49 ` [PATCH 1/6] OMAPDSS: DISPC: cleanup " Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-08 12:36 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-08 13:13 ` Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu
2012-08-08 13:25 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-13 12:10 ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-14 9:58 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-14 12:15 ` Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu
2012-08-14 12:16 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-16 11:30 ` [PATCH V4 " Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-07 8:39 ` [PATCH 2/6] OMAPDSS: DSS: Remove redundant functions Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-07 8:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] OMAPDSS: DSS: Remove cpu_is_xxxx checks Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-07 8:49 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-08-07 13:14 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-08 11:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] OMAPDSS: DSS: Cleanup " Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-08 13:16 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-09 11:51 ` Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu
2012-08-13 12:11 ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-14 9:48 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2012-08-14 12:42 ` Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu
2012-08-14 14:34 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-16 11:30 ` [PATCH V4 " Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-17 13:54 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-20 8:42 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-20 10:48 ` Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu
2012-08-20 10:46 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-07 8:40 ` [PATCH 4/6] OMAPDSS: VENC: Remove " Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-07 8:51 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-08-07 12:48 ` Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-07 8:40 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: OMAP: Disable venc for OMAP4 Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] OMAPDSS: DPI: Remove cpu_is_xxxx checks Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-20 13:33 ` [PATCH V5 0/6] OMAPDSS: Cleanup cpu_is checks Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-20 13:34 ` [PATCH V5 1/6] OMAPDSS: DISPC: cleanup cpu_is_xxxx checks Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-21 10:31 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-21 11:32 ` Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu
2012-08-20 13:35 ` [PATCH V5 2/6] OMAPDSS: DSS: Remove redundant functions Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-20 13:35 ` [PATCH V5 3/6] OMAPDSS: DSS: Cleanup cpu_is_xxxx checks Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-21 10:35 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-21 11:18 ` Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu
2012-08-21 11:20 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-20 13:36 ` [PATCH V5 4/6] OMAPDSS: VENC: Remove " Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-20 13:36 ` [PATCH V5 5/6] ARM: OMAP: Disable venc for OMAP4 Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-21 10:32 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-21 11:25 ` Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu
2012-08-20 13:36 ` [PATCH V5 6/6] OMAPDSS: DPI: Remove cpu_is_xxxx checks Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-22 6:48 ` [PATCH V6 0/6] OMAPDSS: Cleanup cpu_is checks Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-22 6:49 ` [PATCH V6 1/6] OMAPDSS: DISPC: Cleanup cpu_is_xxxx checks Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-22 6:49 ` [PATCH V6 2/6] OMAPDSS: DSS: Remove redundant functions Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-22 6:50 ` [PATCH V6 3/6] OMAPDSS: DSS: Cleanup cpu_is_xxxx checks Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-22 6:50 ` [PATCH V6 4/6] ARM: OMAP: Disable venc for OMAP4 Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-22 6:50 ` [PATCH V6 5/6] OMAPDSS: VENC: Remove cpu_is_xxxx checks Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-22 6:51 ` [PATCH V6 6/6] OMAPDSS: DPI: " Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
2012-08-22 8:44 ` [PATCH V6 0/6] OMAPDSS: Cleanup cpu_is checks Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-30 0:20 ` [PATCH V5 " Tony Lindgren
2012-08-30 7:34 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-30 17:19 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-08-31 11:23 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-09-06 20:08 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1344937705.2345.17.camel@deskari \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=cmahapatra@ti.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).