Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] pci: add pci_iomap_wc() variants

[David Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>]

> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
> > [-cc Venkatesh (bouncing)
> >
> > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> > <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> >>
> >> Thanks! Who's tree should this go through?
> >
> > I don't know.  This is the only patch that went to linux-pci, so I
> > haven't seen the rest.
> 
> Oh I only rev'd a v5 for 1/5 as that's the only one that had feedback
> asking for changes.
> 
> Patch v4 2/5 was for "lib: devres: add pcim_iomap_wc() variants", you
> had questions about EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() and the fact that this is not
> yet used. I replied. This patch can then be ignored but again, I'd
> hate for folks to go in and try to add a non EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()
> symbol of this.
> 
> Patches v4 3-5 remain intact, I had addressed it to you, but failed to
> Cc linux-pci, I'll go ahead and bounce those now.
> 
> Just today Dave Arlie provided a Reviewed-by to some simple
> framebuffer device driver changes. I wonder if these changes should go
> through the framebuffer tree provided you already gave the Acked-by
> for the PCI parts, or if the PCI parts should go in first and only
> later (I guess we'd have to wait) then intake the driver changes that
> use the symbol.
> 
> What we decide should likely also apply to the series that adds
> pci_ioremap_wc_bar() and makes use of it on drivers.
> 
> Dave, Tomi, any preference?
> 

Maybe send Bjorn a pull request with a tree with the pci changes, and the fb changes reviewed-by me and acked by Tomi.

Seems like it could be the simplest path forward.

Dave.