Re: [PATCH] OMAPDSS: Cleanup DSSDBG with dynamic pr_debug function

[Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5314 bytes --]

On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 11:33 +0530, Chandrabhanu Mahapatra wrote:
> The printk in DSSDBG function definition is replaced with dynamic debug enabled
> pr_debug(). The use of dynamic debugging provides more flexiblity as each debug
> statement can be enabled or disabled dynamically on basis of source filename,
> line number, module name etc. by writing to a control file in debugfs
> filesystem. For better undertsanding please refer to
> Documentation/dynamic-debug-howto.txt.
> 
> The DSSDBGF() differs from DSSDBG() by providing function name. However,
> function name, line number, module name and thread ID can be printed through
> dynamic debug by setting appropiate flags 'f','l','m' and 't' in the debugfs
> control file. So, DSSDBGF instances are replaced with DSSDBG.

Typos with: flexiblity, undertsanding, appropiate.

> Signed-off-by: Chandrabhanu Mahapatra <cmahapatra@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c |    8 ++++----
>  drivers/video/omap2/dss/dsi.c   |   12 ++++--------
>  drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h   |   34 ++++++++--------------------------
>  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c
> index 6354bb8..cb86d94 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c
> @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static void dss_ovl_write_regs(struct omap_overlay *ovl)
>  	struct mgr_priv_data *mp;
>  	int r;
>  
> -	DSSDBGF("%d", ovl->id);
> +	DSSDBG("%d", ovl->id);

I don't think this is good. It's true that dyn-debug can print the
function name, but that's optional. The debug message should be somehow
sensible independently, but in this case only a number is printed which
is totally meaningless.

Either the messages should be modified to give a hint what's going on,
or the DSSDBGF could be kept for now. In the above case the debug
message could be something like "writing ovl %d regs".

However, I think it'd be easier just to keep the DSSDBGF for now, and
remove it gradually.

>  	if (!op->enabled || !op->info_dirty)
>  		return;
> @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ static void dss_ovl_write_regs_extra(struct omap_overlay *ovl)
>  	struct ovl_priv_data *op = get_ovl_priv(ovl);
>  	struct mgr_priv_data *mp;
>  
> -	DSSDBGF("%d", ovl->id);
> +	DSSDBG("%d", ovl->id);
>  
>  	if (!op->extra_info_dirty)
>  		return;
> @@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ static void dss_mgr_write_regs(struct omap_overlay_manager *mgr)
>  	struct mgr_priv_data *mp = get_mgr_priv(mgr);
>  	struct omap_overlay *ovl;
>  
> -	DSSDBGF("%d", mgr->id);
> +	DSSDBG("%d", mgr->id);
>  
>  	if (!mp->enabled)
>  		return;
> @@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ static void dss_mgr_write_regs_extra(struct omap_overlay_manager *mgr)
>  {
>  	struct mgr_priv_data *mp = get_mgr_priv(mgr);
>  
> -	DSSDBGF("%d", mgr->id);
> +	DSSDBG("%d", mgr->id);
>  
>  	if (!mp->extra_info_dirty)
>  		return;
> diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dsi.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dsi.c
> index 8d815e3..8304cc6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dsi.c
> @@ -1525,8 +1525,6 @@ int dsi_pll_set_clock_div(struct platform_device *dsidev,
>  	u8 regn_start, regn_end, regm_start, regm_end;
>  	u8 regm_dispc_start, regm_dispc_end, regm_dsi_start, regm_dsi_end;
>  
> -	DSSDBGF();
> -
>  	dsi->current_cinfo.clkin = cinfo->clkin;
>  	dsi->current_cinfo.fint = cinfo->fint;
>  	dsi->current_cinfo.clkin4ddr = cinfo->clkin4ddr;
> @@ -2334,8 +2332,6 @@ static int dsi_cio_init(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
>  	int r;
>  	u32 l;
>  
> -	DSSDBGF();
> -
>  	r = dss_dsi_enable_pads(dsi->module_id, dsi_get_lane_mask(dssdev));
>  	if (r)
>  		return r;
> @@ -2686,7 +2682,7 @@ static void dsi_vc_initial_config(struct platform_device *dsidev, int channel)
>  {
>  	u32 r;
>  
> -	DSSDBGF("%d", channel);
> +	DSSDBG("%d", channel);
>  
>  	r = dsi_read_reg(dsidev, DSI_VC_CTRL(channel));
>  
> @@ -2718,7 +2714,7 @@ static int dsi_vc_config_source(struct platform_device *dsidev, int channel,
>  	if (dsi->vc[channel].source == source)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	DSSDBGF("%d", channel);
> +	DSSDBG("%d", channel);
>  
>  	dsi_sync_vc(dsidev, channel);
>  
> @@ -3475,7 +3471,7 @@ static int dsi_enter_ulps(struct platform_device *dsidev)
>  	int r, i;
>  	unsigned mask;
>  
> -	DSSDBGF();
> +	DSSDBG("");

This debug message is even less meaningful than the overlay number =).
Again, I think either keep the DSSDBGF, or print something sensible,
like "entering ULPS".

>  
>  	WARN_ON(!dsi_bus_is_locked(dsidev));
>  
> @@ -4184,7 +4180,7 @@ int omapdss_dsi_set_clocks(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev,
>  	unsigned long pck;
>  	int r;
>  
> -	DSSDBGF("ddr_clk %lu, lp_clk %lu", ddr_clk, lp_clk);
> +	DSSDBG("ddr_clk %lu, lp_clk %lu", ddr_clk, lp_clk);
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dsi->lock);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h
> index 5e9fd769..3a2caab 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h
> +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h
> @@ -29,38 +29,20 @@
>  
>  #ifdef DEBUG
>  extern bool dss_debug;

You still left the dss_debug option here, even if it's not used by the
DSSDBG anymore. What's your plan about this?

 Tomi


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]