From: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
To: tomi.valkeinen@ti.com
Cc: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, pali.rohar@gmail.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@abv.bg>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing mutex unlocks
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2014 13:13:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1388927585-5640-1-git-send-email-ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52C956E9.2030008@gmail.com>
From: Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@abv.bg>
Commit c37dd677988ca50bc8bc60ab5ab053720583c168 fixes the unbalanced
unlock in acx565akm_enable but introduces another problem - if
acx565akm_panel_power_on exits early, the mutex is not unlocked. Fix
that by unlocking the mutex on early return. Also add mutex protection in
acx565akm_panel_power_off and remove an unused variable
Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@abv.bg>
---
.../omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c | 16 ++++++++++------
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c b/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
index d94f35d..9aef7fa 100644
--- a/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
+++ b/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
@@ -535,6 +535,7 @@ static int acx565akm_panel_power_on(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
r = in->ops.sdi->enable(in);
if (r) {
+ mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
pr_err("%s sdi enable failed\n", __func__);
return r;
}
@@ -546,6 +547,7 @@ static int acx565akm_panel_power_on(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
gpio_set_value(ddata->reset_gpio, 1);
if (ddata->enabled) {
+ mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
dev_dbg(&ddata->spi->dev, "panel already enabled\n");
return 0;
}
@@ -578,10 +580,14 @@ static void acx565akm_panel_power_off(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
struct panel_drv_data *ddata = to_panel_data(dssdev);
struct omap_dss_device *in = ddata->in;
+ mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex);
+
dev_dbg(dssdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
- if (!ddata->enabled)
+ if (!ddata->enabled) {
+ mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
return;
+ }
set_display_state(ddata, 0);
set_sleep_mode(ddata, 1);
@@ -601,11 +607,13 @@ static void acx565akm_panel_power_off(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
msleep(100);
in->ops.sdi->disable(in);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
+
}
static int acx565akm_enable(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
{
- struct panel_drv_data *ddata = to_panel_data(dssdev);
int r;
dev_dbg(dssdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
@@ -627,16 +635,12 @@ static int acx565akm_enable(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
static void acx565akm_disable(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
{
- struct panel_drv_data *ddata = to_panel_data(dssdev);
-
dev_dbg(dssdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
if (!omapdss_device_is_enabled(dssdev))
return;
- mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex);
acx565akm_panel_power_off(dssdev);
- mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
dssdev->state = OMAP_DSS_DISPLAY_DISABLED;
}
--
1.5.6.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-05 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-06 21:24 [PATCH] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix bad unlock balance Aaro Koskinen
2013-11-11 13:37 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-11-11 18:37 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-12-06 12:55 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing unlock in acx565akm_panel_power_on() Wei Yongjun
2013-12-11 14:29 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-12-30 16:17 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing mutex unlocks Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-04 12:51 ` Pavel Machek
2014-01-05 12:58 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-05 13:13 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov [this message]
2014-01-10 10:56 ` [PATCH v2] " Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-11 9:39 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-13 10:20 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-12-25 13:29 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2015-12-29 7:46 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2016-01-01 12:25 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1388927585-5640-1-git-send-email-ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com \
--to=ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com \
--cc=freemangordon@abv.bg \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).