From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Brezillon Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:56:24 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v4 01/24] pwm: rcar: make use of pwm_is_enabled() Message-Id: <1447664207-24370-2-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> List-Id: References: <1447664207-24370-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> In-Reply-To: <1447664207-24370-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Commit 5c31252c4a86 ("pwm: Add the pwm_is_enabled() helper") introduced a new function to test whether a PWM device is enabled or not without manipulating PWM internal fields. Hiding this is necessary if we want to smoothly move to the atomic PWM config approach without impacting PWM drivers. Fix this driver to use pwm_is_enabled() instead of directly accessing the ->flags field. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon --- drivers/pwm/pwm-rcar.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rcar.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rcar.c index 6e99a63..70899c9 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rcar.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rcar.c @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static int rcar_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, return div; /* Let the core driver set pwm->period if disabled and duty_ns = 0 */ - if (!test_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwm->flags) && !duty_ns) + if (!pwm_is_enabled(pwm) && !duty_ns) return 0; rcar_pwm_update(rp, RCAR_PWMCR_SYNC, RCAR_PWMCR_SYNC, RCAR_PWMCR); -- 2.1.4