[PATCH V4 21/26] backlight: deprecate pci_get_bus_and_slot()

[PATCH V4 21/26] backlight: deprecate pci_get_bus_and_slot()

[Sinan Kaya]

pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as
where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be
reused for other domain numbers.

Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot() function in favor of
pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot().

Hard-coding the domain as 0.

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/apple_bl.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/apple_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/apple_bl.c
index d843296..6a34ab9 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/apple_bl.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/apple_bl.c
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static int apple_bl_add(struct acpi_device *dev)
 	struct pci_dev *host;
 	int intensity;
 
-	host = pci_get_bus_and_slot(0, 0);
+	host = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(0, 0, 0);
 
 	if (!host) {
 		pr_err("unable to find PCI host\n");
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH V4 21/26] backlight: deprecate pci_get_bus_and_slot()

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 19 Dec 2017, Sinan Kaya wrote:

> pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as
> where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be
> reused for other domain numbers.
> 
> Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot() function in favor of
> pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot().
> 
> Hard-coding the domain as 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/video/backlight/apple_bl.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

[PATCH V4 22/26] video: fbdev: intelfb: deprecate pci_get_bus_and_slot()

[Sinan Kaya]

pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as
where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be
reused for other domain numbers.

Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot() function in favor of
pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot().

Find the domain number from pdev.

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/video/fbdev/intelfb/intelfbhw.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/intelfb/intelfbhw.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/intelfb/intelfbhw.c
index 83fec57..57aff74 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/intelfb/intelfbhw.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/intelfb/intelfbhw.c
@@ -181,7 +181,9 @@ int intelfbhw_get_memory(struct pci_dev *pdev, int *aperture_size,
 		return 1;
 
 	/* Find the bridge device.  It is always 0:0.0 */
-	if (!(bridge_dev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(0, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0)))) {
+	bridge_dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus), 0,
+						 PCI_DEVFN(0, 0));
+	if (!bridge_dev) {
 		ERR_MSG("cannot find bridge device\n");
 		return 1;
 	}
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH V4 22/26] video: fbdev: intelfb: deprecate pci_get_bus_and_slot()

[Sinan Kaya]

On 12/19/2017 12:37 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as
> where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be
> reused for other domain numbers.
> 
> Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot() function in favor of
> pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot().
> 
> Find the domain number from pdev.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>

Any feedback here ? most of the remaining patches have the ACK except these.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Re: [PATCH V4 22/26] video: fbdev: intelfb: deprecate pci_get_bus_and_slot()

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

On Tuesday, January 02, 2018 08:38:24 AM Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 12/19/2017 12:37 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as
> > where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be
> > reused for other domain numbers.
> > 
> > Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot() function in favor of
> > pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot().
> > 
> > Find the domain number from pdev.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> 
> Any feedback here ? most of the remaining patches have the ACK except these.

Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

[PATCH V4 23/26] video: fbdev: nvidia: deprecate pci_get_bus_and_slot()

[Sinan Kaya]

pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as
where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be
reused for other domain numbers.

Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot() function in favor of
pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot().

struct nvidia_par has a pointer to struct pci_dev. Use the pci_dev
member to extract the domain information and pass it to
pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() function.

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/video/fbdev/nvidia/nv_hw.c    | 11 ++++++-----
 drivers/video/fbdev/nvidia/nv_setup.c |  3 ++-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/nvidia/nv_hw.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/nvidia/nv_hw.c
index 81c80ac..8335da4 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/nvidia/nv_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/nvidia/nv_hw.c
@@ -683,10 +683,11 @@ static void nForceUpdateArbitrationSettings(unsigned VClk,
 	nv10_sim_state sim_data;
 	unsigned int M, N, P, pll, MClk, NVClk, memctrl;
 	struct pci_dev *dev;
+	int domain = pci_domain_nr(par->pci_dev->bus);
 
 	if ((par->Chipset & 0x0FF0) = 0x01A0) {
 		unsigned int uMClkPostDiv;
-		dev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(0, 3);
+		dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(domain, 0, 3);
 		pci_read_config_dword(dev, 0x6C, &uMClkPostDiv);
 		uMClkPostDiv = (uMClkPostDiv >> 8) & 0xf;
 
@@ -694,7 +695,7 @@ static void nForceUpdateArbitrationSettings(unsigned VClk,
 			uMClkPostDiv = 4;
 		MClk = 400000 / uMClkPostDiv;
 	} else {
-		dev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(0, 5);
+		dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(domain, 0, 5);
 		pci_read_config_dword(dev, 0x4c, &MClk);
 		MClk /= 1000;
 	}
@@ -707,13 +708,13 @@ static void nForceUpdateArbitrationSettings(unsigned VClk,
 	sim_data.pix_bpp = (char)pixelDepth;
 	sim_data.enable_video = 0;
 	sim_data.enable_mp = 0;
-	dev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(0, 1);
+	dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(domain, 0, 1);
 	pci_read_config_dword(dev, 0x7C, &sim_data.memory_type);
 	pci_dev_put(dev);
 	sim_data.memory_type = (sim_data.memory_type >> 12) & 1;
 	sim_data.memory_width = 64;
 
-	dev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(0, 3);
+	dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(domain, 0, 3);
 	pci_read_config_dword(dev, 0, &memctrl);
 	pci_dev_put(dev);
 	memctrl >>= 16;
@@ -721,7 +722,7 @@ static void nForceUpdateArbitrationSettings(unsigned VClk,
 	if ((memctrl = 0x1A9) || (memctrl = 0x1AB) || (memctrl = 0x1ED)) {
 		u32 dimm[3];
 
-		dev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(0, 2);
+		dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(domain, 0, 2);
 		pci_read_config_dword(dev, 0x40, &dimm[0]);
 		dimm[0] = (dimm[0] >> 8) & 0x4f;
 		pci_read_config_dword(dev, 0x44, &dimm[1]);
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/nvidia/nv_setup.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/nvidia/nv_setup.c
index 2f2e162..b17acd2 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/nvidia/nv_setup.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/nvidia/nv_setup.c
@@ -264,7 +264,8 @@ static void nv10GetConfig(struct nvidia_par *par)
 	}
 #endif
 
-	dev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(0, 1);
+	dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(pci_domain_nr(par->pci_dev->bus),
+					  0, 1);
 	if ((par->Chipset & 0xffff) = 0x01a0) {
 		u32 amt;
 
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH V4 23/26] video: fbdev: nvidia: deprecate pci_get_bus_and_slot()

[Sinan Kaya]

On 12/19/2017 12:37 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as
> where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be
> reused for other domain numbers.
> 
> Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot() function in favor of
> pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot().
> 
> struct nvidia_par has a pointer to struct pci_dev. Use the pci_dev
> member to extract the domain information and pass it to
> pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>

Any feedback here ? most of the remaining patches have the ACK except these.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Re: [PATCH V4 23/26] video: fbdev: nvidia: deprecate pci_get_bus_and_slot()

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

On Tuesday, January 02, 2018 08:38:03 AM Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 12/19/2017 12:37 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as
> > where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be
> > reused for other domain numbers.
> > 
> > Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot() function in favor of
> > pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot().
> > 
> > struct nvidia_par has a pointer to struct pci_dev. Use the pci_dev
> > member to extract the domain information and pass it to
> > pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() function.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> 
> Any feedback here ? most of the remaining patches have the ACK except these.

Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

[PATCH V4 24/26] video: fbdev: riva: deprecate pci_get_bus_and_slot()

[Sinan Kaya]

pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as
where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be
reused for other domain numbers.

Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot() function in favor of
pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot().

struct riva_par has a pointer to struct pci_dev. Use the pci_dev member
to extract the domain information.

Change the function signature for CalcStateExt and RivaGetConfig to pass
in struct pci_dev in addition to RIVA_HW_INST so that code inside the
riva_hw.c can also calculate domain number and pass it to
pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot().

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/video/fbdev/riva/fbdev.c     |  2 +-
 drivers/video/fbdev/riva/nv_driver.c |  7 ++++---
 drivers/video/fbdev/riva/riva_hw.c   | 20 +++++++++++++-------
 drivers/video/fbdev/riva/riva_hw.h   |  3 ++-
 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/riva/fbdev.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/riva/fbdev.c
index 1ea78bb..ff82823 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/riva/fbdev.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/riva/fbdev.c
@@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ static int riva_load_video_mode(struct fb_info *info)
 	else
 		newmode.misc_output |= 0x80;	
 
-	rc = CalcStateExt(&par->riva, &newmode.ext, bpp, width,
+	rc = CalcStateExt(&par->riva, &newmode.ext, par->pdev, bpp, width,
 			  hDisplaySize, height, dotClock);
 	if (rc)
 		goto out;
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/riva/nv_driver.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/riva/nv_driver.c
index f3694cf..a3d9c66 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/riva/nv_driver.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/riva/nv_driver.c
@@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ unsigned long riva_get_memlen(struct riva_par *par)
 	unsigned int chipset = par->Chipset;
 	struct pci_dev* dev;
 	u32 amt;
+	int domain = pci_domain_nr(par->pdev->bus);
 
 	switch (chip->Architecture) {
 	case NV_ARCH_03:
@@ -226,12 +227,12 @@ unsigned long riva_get_memlen(struct riva_par *par)
 	case NV_ARCH_30:
 		if(chipset = NV_CHIP_IGEFORCE2) {
 
-			dev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(0, 1);
+			dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(domain, 0, 1);
 			pci_read_config_dword(dev, 0x7C, &amt);
 			pci_dev_put(dev);
 			memlen = (((amt >> 6) & 31) + 1) * 1024;
 		} else if (chipset = NV_CHIP_0x01F0) {
-			dev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(0, 1);
+			dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(domain, 0, 1);
 			pci_read_config_dword(dev, 0x84, &amt);
 			pci_dev_put(dev);
 			memlen = (((amt >> 4) & 127) + 1) * 1024;
@@ -417,6 +418,6 @@ unsigned long riva_get_maxdclk(struct riva_par *par)
 	}
 	par->riva.flatPanel = (par->FlatPanel > 0) ? TRUE : FALSE;
 
-	RivaGetConfig(&par->riva, par->Chipset);
+	RivaGetConfig(&par->riva, par->pdev, par->Chipset);
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/riva/riva_hw.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/riva/riva_hw.c
index 8bdf37f..0601c13 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/riva/riva_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/riva/riva_hw.c
@@ -1108,7 +1108,8 @@ static char nv3_get_param(nv3_fifo_info *res_info, nv3_sim_state * state, nv3_ar
     unsigned      pixelDepth,
     unsigned     *burst,
     unsigned     *lwm,
-    RIVA_HW_INST *chip
+    RIVA_HW_INST *chip,
+    struct pci_dev *pdev
 )
 {
     nv10_fifo_info fifo_data;
@@ -1116,8 +1117,9 @@ static char nv3_get_param(nv3_fifo_info *res_info, nv3_sim_state * state, nv3_ar
     unsigned int M, N, P, pll, MClk, NVClk;
     unsigned int uMClkPostDiv;
     struct pci_dev *dev;
+    int domain = pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus);
 
-    dev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(0, 3);
+    dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(domain, 0, 3);
     pci_read_config_dword(dev, 0x6C, &uMClkPostDiv);
     pci_dev_put(dev);
     uMClkPostDiv = (uMClkPostDiv >> 8) & 0xf;
@@ -1132,7 +1134,7 @@ static char nv3_get_param(nv3_fifo_info *res_info, nv3_sim_state * state, nv3_ar
     sim_data.enable_video   = 0;
     sim_data.enable_mp      = 0;
 
-    dev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(0, 1);
+    dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(domain, 0, 1);
     pci_read_config_dword(dev, 0x7C, &sim_data.memory_type);
     pci_dev_put(dev);
     sim_data.memory_type    = (sim_data.memory_type >> 12) & 1;
@@ -1234,6 +1236,7 @@ static char nv3_get_param(nv3_fifo_info *res_info, nv3_sim_state * state, nv3_ar
 (
     RIVA_HW_INST  *chip,
     RIVA_HW_STATE *state,
+    struct pci_dev *pdev,
     int            bpp,
     int            width,
     int            hDisplaySize,
@@ -1300,7 +1303,7 @@ static char nv3_get_param(nv3_fifo_info *res_info, nv3_sim_state * state, nv3_ar
                                           pixelDepth * 8,
                                          &(state->arbitration0),
                                          &(state->arbitration1),
-                                          chip);
+                                          chip, pdev);
             } else {
                 nv10UpdateArbitrationSettings(VClk, 
                                           pixelDepth * 8, 
@@ -2102,10 +2105,12 @@ static char nv3_get_param(nv3_fifo_info *res_info, nv3_sim_state * state, nv3_ar
 static void nv10GetConfig
 (
     RIVA_HW_INST *chip,
+    struct pci_dev *pdev,
     unsigned int chipset
 )
 {
     struct pci_dev* dev;
+    int domain = pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus);
     u32 amt;
 
 #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
@@ -2118,12 +2123,12 @@ static char nv3_get_param(nv3_fifo_info *res_info, nv3_sim_state * state, nv3_ar
      * Fill in chip configuration.
      */
     if(chipset = NV_CHIP_IGEFORCE2) {
-        dev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(0, 1);
+        dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(domain, 0, 1);
         pci_read_config_dword(dev, 0x7C, &amt);
         pci_dev_put(dev);
         chip->RamAmountKBytes = (((amt >> 6) & 31) + 1) * 1024;
     } else if(chipset = NV_CHIP_0x01F0) {
-        dev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(0, 1);
+        dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(domain, 0, 1);
         pci_read_config_dword(dev, 0x84, &amt);
         pci_dev_put(dev);
         chip->RamAmountKBytes = (((amt >> 4) & 127) + 1) * 1024;
@@ -2224,6 +2229,7 @@ static char nv3_get_param(nv3_fifo_info *res_info, nv3_sim_state * state, nv3_ar
 int RivaGetConfig
 (
     RIVA_HW_INST *chip,
+    struct pci_dev *pdev,
     unsigned int chipset
 )
 {
@@ -2245,7 +2251,7 @@ static char nv3_get_param(nv3_fifo_info *res_info, nv3_sim_state * state, nv3_ar
         case NV_ARCH_10:
         case NV_ARCH_20:
         case NV_ARCH_30:
-            nv10GetConfig(chip, chipset);
+            nv10GetConfig(chip, pdev, chipset);
             break;
         default:
             return (-1);
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/riva/riva_hw.h b/drivers/video/fbdev/riva/riva_hw.h
index c2769f7..5e7b354 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/riva/riva_hw.h
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/riva/riva_hw.h
@@ -536,6 +536,7 @@
 (
     RIVA_HW_INST  *chip,
     RIVA_HW_STATE *state,
+    struct pci_dev *pdev,
     int            bpp,
     int            width,
     int            hDisplaySize,
@@ -546,7 +547,7 @@
 /*
  * External routines.
  */
-int RivaGetConfig(RIVA_HW_INST *, unsigned int);
+int RivaGetConfig(RIVA_HW_INST *chip, struct pci_dev *pdev, unsigned int c);
 /*
  * FIFO Free Count. Should attempt to yield processor if RIVA is busy.
  */
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH V4 24/26] video: fbdev: riva: deprecate pci_get_bus_and_slot()

[Sinan Kaya]

On 12/19/2017 12:38 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as
> where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be
> reused for other domain numbers.
> 
> Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot() function in favor of
> pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot().
> 
> struct riva_par has a pointer to struct pci_dev. Use the pci_dev member
> to extract the domain information.
> 
> Change the function signature for CalcStateExt and RivaGetConfig to pass
> in struct pci_dev in addition to RIVA_HW_INST so that code inside the
> riva_hw.c can also calculate domain number and pass it to
> pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>

Any feedback here, most of the remaining patches have the ACK except these?

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Re: [PATCH V4 24/26] video: fbdev: riva: deprecate pci_get_bus_and_slot()

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

On Tuesday, January 02, 2018 08:37:32 AM Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 12/19/2017 12:38 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as
> > where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be
> > reused for other domain numbers.
> > 
> > Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot() function in favor of
> > pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot().
> > 
> > struct riva_par has a pointer to struct pci_dev. Use the pci_dev member
> > to extract the domain information.
> > 
> > Change the function signature for CalcStateExt and RivaGetConfig to pass
> > in struct pci_dev in addition to RIVA_HW_INST so that code inside the
> > riva_hw.c can also calculate domain number and pass it to
> > pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> 
> Any feedback here, most of the remaining patches have the ACK except these?

Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics