From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] video/console: Add dmi quirk table for x86 systems which need fbcon rotation
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 07:56:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1532ea23-c438-f274-e18a-2c0eac02e909@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170706142839.14659-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>
Hi,
On 24-07-17 09:49, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 12:32:22 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> On 21-07-17 10:59, Jean Delvare wrote:
>>> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:11:17 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 15:33:09 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>>> On 07-07-17 21:02, Jean Delvare wrote:
>>>>>> (...)
>>>>>> "dmi_match" should probably have been named "dmi_field_match" instead,
>>>>>> maybe it should be renamed to that now for consistency and clarity?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes I think that would be good, but outside of the scope of this patch-set.
>>>>
>>>> Of course, I meant it that way. I'll take care of it separately.
>>>
>>> As I was looking into this, I noticed function dmi_first_match(), which
>>> seems to do what you need. Here's an untested proof-of-concept, what do
>>> you think?
>>
>> I already considered using dmi_first_match() but that will not work
>> because the 2 different GPD devices have identical DMI strings other then
>> their bios-dates (GRRR).
>
> Doh. I noticed it, and found a way around it, and implemented it... and
> forgot to refresh the patch before posting it :-( Maybe no longer
> relevant as you have found yet another way, but here it is still for
> your consideration:
<snip>
Ah yes that will work too, but TBH I think my own solution is a bit
cleaner, so lets go with v4 as is (as I already posted it) assuming
no-one finds any issues with it.
Regards,
Hans
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-24 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-06 14:28 [PATCH v2] video/console: Add dmi quirk table for x86 systems which need fbcon rotation Hans de Goede
2017-07-07 19:02 ` Jean Delvare
2017-07-08 13:33 ` Hans de Goede
2017-07-20 8:11 ` Jean Delvare
2017-07-21 8:59 ` Jean Delvare
2017-07-23 10:32 ` Hans de Goede
2017-07-24 7:49 ` Jean Delvare
2017-07-24 7:56 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1532ea23-c438-f274-e18a-2c0eac02e909@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).