From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix mach64_gx.c Date: Sat, 3 May 2003 08:09:14 +1000 Sender: linux-fbdev-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <16050.60554.651489.795368@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <16050.3732.615164.697680@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150] helo=lists.samba.org) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19Biix-0002uO-00 for ; Fri, 02 May 2003 15:09:47 -0700 In-Reply-To: Errors-To: linux-fbdev-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: James Simmons Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net James Simmons writes: > Has anyone tested this chipset on a PPC 64? There aren't any PPC64 boxes with this chipset (ATI Mach64 GX), since all past and current PPC64 boxes are IBM servers. I suppose one could find an old ATI Mach64 PCI card and put it in a PPC64 box, but I don't know why you would do that instead of putting in a PCI radeon or something. :) Regards, Paul. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf