Linux Framebuffer Layer development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] boot-screen override by "34db50e55656 efifb: Copy the ACPI BGRT"
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 14:16:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1982440.Fn0LzJ7a3l@amdc3058> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANq1E4QwNg0VuAZZtatOTXspv7Y-z_HSa-9CHzK2Y28CGK8W4Q@mail.gmail.com>


Hi,

On Monday, September 03, 2018 03:23:38 PM David Herrmann wrote:
> Hey
> 
> Since this commit:
> 
>     34db50e55656 efifb: Copy the ACPI BGRT
> 
> the kernel will override boot-splashs unasked. This breaks the
> graphical boot-process on our setups. In particular, we have a setup
> where an efi-boot-entry draws the early boot-splash on-screen, then
> hands-over to the linux-kernel + initrd. The boot-splash daemon in the
> initrd then takes over control of possible animations.
> 
> With the mentioned commit compiled in, the kernel will redraw the
> firmware logo on screen at a random time without any way to intervene.

You have CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_DEFERRED_TAKEOVER=y (the deferred
console takeover support introduced in v4,19-rc1). I assume that this
is intended?

> What is the intention of this commit? Why is the kernel re-drawing the
> firmware logo unasked? If someone during the boot-process draws
> content on the screen, I would prefer if the kernel does not clear
> that on driver load.

+/*
+ * If fbcon deffered console takeover is configured, the intent is for the
+ * framebuffer to show the boot graphics (e.g. vendor logo) until there is some
+ * (error) message to display. But the boot graphics may have been destroyed by
+ * e.g. option ROM output, detect this and restore the boot graphics.
+ */
+#if defined CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_DEFERRED_TAKEOVER && \
+    defined CONFIG_ACPI_BGRT
...
+static void efifb_show_boot_graphics(struct fb_info *info)
...
+#else
+static inline void efifb_show_boot_graphics(struct fb_info *info) {}
+#endif

> Can we either provide an option to disable this feature, or revert the commit?

Hans?

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-03 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20180903132353epcas4p373e876f1b52dbed6df7bd3acc73fcdf4@epcas4p3.samsung.com>
2018-09-03 13:23 ` [REGRESSION] boot-screen override by "34db50e55656 efifb: Copy the ACPI BGRT" David Herrmann
2018-09-03 14:16   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2018-09-03 14:47     ` Hans de Goede
2018-09-03 15:11       ` David Herrmann
2018-09-12  9:13         ` Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1982440.Fn0LzJ7a3l@amdc3058 \
    --to=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=dh.herrmann@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox