From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
Cc: James Simmons <jsimmons@transvirtual.com>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Fbdev development list
<linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.19
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 00:25:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020530002559.G30585@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CF554A1.4090607@evision-ventures.com>; from dalecki@evision-ventures.com on Thu, May 30, 2002 at 12:22:25AM +0200
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 12:22:25AM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> Dear Russell why don't you just abuse Linus as a spinlock for this kind
> of synchronization its his job. No need to get angry at this.
> Hey it's developement series time...
The fundamental point I'm making is people shouldn't go around taking
changes randomly from maintainers trees, and believing that they know
far better than the maintainer what they're doing, especially when they
don't have the hardware to even try it out, and go submitting these
changes to Linus without even asking about it first... after the
maintainer has been very careful and explicitly not submitted
the change because they have very good reasons not to.
What if I were to take, say, Mochel's experimental tree and send some
random alpha code to Linus? Let anarchy rule!
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-29 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20020529211702.E30585@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
2002-05-29 20:44 ` Linux 2.5.19 James Simmons
2002-05-29 20:47 ` Russell King
2002-05-29 22:22 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 23:25 ` Russell King [this message]
2002-05-29 22:42 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 23:52 ` Russell King
2002-05-29 23:00 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 22:43 ` James Simmons
2002-05-29 22:29 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 23:31 ` Russell King
2002-05-30 5:10 ` Framebuffer policy [ was Re: Linux 2.5.19] James Simmons
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020530002559.G30585@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=jsimmons@transvirtual.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).