From: Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
To: Petr Vandrovec <VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz>
Cc: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>,
Linux Fbdev development list
<linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
adaplas@pol.net
Subject: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH]: EDID parser
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 09:40:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030403074013.GA3642@iliana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <418DE32AA8@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz>
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 03:07:33AM +0100, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> On 2 Apr 03 at 22:55, James Simmons wrote:
>
> > It doesn't need a struct pci_dev in this case. It is possible to get this
> > info from the i2c bus but I never seen any drivers do this. What data would
> > we have to pass in get the EDID inforamtion? So the question is how
> > generic will get_EDID end up being or will we have to have driver specfic
> > hooks since I don't pitcure i2c approaches being the same for each video
> > card. Petr didn't you attempt this with the matrox driver at one time?
>
> Yes, matroxfb provides one i2c (DDC) bus for each output videocard has.
> I ended with only this support (and userspace EDID parser) as i2c was
> initialized loong after framebuffer at that time... Now when i2c is usable
> when fbdev initializes, it looks much better.
>
> Only get_EDID interface I need is one which gets i2c bus as argument. But
> I have no idea how I should handle situation where you have connected
> two different monitors to both crtc1 outputs... Like 50Hz PAL TV &
> 60+Hz VGA monitor. Currently it is user responsibility to resolve such
> situation...
Is the EDID reading stuff not done per head ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-03 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-03 2:07 [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH]: EDID parser Petr Vandrovec
2003-04-03 7:40 ` Sven Luther [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-03 14:38 Petr Vandrovec
2003-04-03 13:48 ` Sven Luther
2003-04-03 14:05 Petr Vandrovec
2003-04-03 13:11 ` Sven Luther
2003-04-03 13:55 Petr Vandrovec
2003-04-03 14:15 ` Sven Luther
2003-04-03 15:21 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-03 16:21 ` Sven Luther
2003-04-03 16:18 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-03 16:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-04-03 17:10 ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Sven Luther
2003-04-03 16:15 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-03 17:18 ` Sven Luther
2003-04-03 16:29 ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Alan Cox
2003-04-03 11:05 Petr Vandrovec
2003-04-03 12:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-04-03 12:38 ` Sven Luther
2003-04-02 15:41 Antonino Daplas
2003-04-02 21:55 ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " James Simmons
2003-04-02 22:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-04-03 0:45 ` Antonino Daplas
2003-04-03 6:44 ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-04-03 7:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030403074013.GA3642@iliana \
--to=luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr \
--cc=VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz \
--cc=adaplas@pol.net \
--cc=jsimmons@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).