From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH] cg*: New framebuffer_alloc API and class_dev changes Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:27:05 -0700 Sender: linux-fbdev-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20030915162705.24913719.davem@redhat.com> References: <20030915194259.GG16370@dreamland.darkstar.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19z2vd-0005n3-00 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:38:45 -0700 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242] ident=root) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19z2vc-0000PV-Hg for linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:38:44 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20030915194259.GG16370@dreamland.darkstar.lan> Errors-To: linux-fbdev-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: kronos@kronoz.cjb.net Cc: linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, jsimmons@infradead.org On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 21:42:59 +0200 Kronos wrote: > this patch converts driver/video/cg*.c to framebuffer_alloc: This patch also does not apply cleanly to current 2.6.x sources. Are these patches against some special set of framebuffer changes that are not in 2.6.x yet? If so, could you _PLEASE_ indicate this when you send patches directly to me? When I see a patch that I'm sent directly, I expect that this means I should apply it to my tree and that the patch works with current vanilla sources. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf