* [PATCH] new version ATI Mach64 for Linux-2.6.0-test5
@ 2003-09-21 19:47 Alexander Kern
2003-09-22 7:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Kern @ 2003-09-21 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fbdev; +Cc: Adam Agnew, Daniël Mantione, Geert Uytterhoeven,
Nicolas Souchu
Hallo all,
after I read an E-Mail from Daniel about troubles with right DSP_ON_OFF
values, I found the cause for my problems. Yet I've got beauty image on my
1400x1050 LCD even with 640x400. I have probed the Daniel's code too, but this
one had not so good results, strange.
This work is porting from Daniel Mantione driver for Linux 2.4.x, partially
inspiring from "XL no BIOS" patch and of course "XFree ati driver".
Daniel,
what's size of LCD of testmachines, where you test? I think, that the my
troubles with your clean code is, that you test on notebook with 800x600 or
similar. Next smaller resolution is 640x480. It's approximately 80%. And with
800x600, first double scan is 400x300, 50%. It's all simple values.
By me with 1400x1050, nearest resolution is 1280x1024, 91%.
First doublescan resolution is 640x480 is 45%.
That's why I can't replace ATIReduceRatio with everything simple.
I hope, that this version will work good on notebooks with smaller DFP too.
And I hope too, that I become many feedbacks with test results.
Have a nice test time.
Alex
P.S.
Patch is on http://home.arcor.de/alexander.khe/aty_mobility/
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] new version ATI Mach64 for Linux-2.6.0-test5
2003-09-21 19:47 [PATCH] new version ATI Mach64 for Linux-2.6.0-test5 Alexander Kern
@ 2003-09-22 7:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2003-09-22 7:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Kern; +Cc: fbdev, Adam Agnew, Daniël Mantione, Nicolas Souchu
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Alexander Kern wrote:
> what's size of LCD of testmachines, where you test? I think, that the my
> troubles with your clean code is, that you test on notebook with 800x600 or
> similar. Next smaller resolution is 640x480. It's approximately 80%. And with
> 800x600, first double scan is 400x300, 50%. It's all simple values.
FYI, My Vaio PCG-Z600TEK has a 1024x768 TFT.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-22 7:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-21 19:47 [PATCH] new version ATI Mach64 for Linux-2.6.0-test5 Alexander Kern
2003-09-22 7:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).