From: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@yahoo.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu>,
kronos@kronoz.cjb.net,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] Re: DRM and pci_driver conversion
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 18:50:04 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031024015004.16330.qmail@web14913.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310231541000.3421-100000@home.osdl.org>
Wouldn't it be better to add ROM enable/disable functions to the PCI driver
than to scatter it out into every driver? All of the framebuffer and DRM
drivers need to do this. I also seem to remember that there are more steps
needed if this is going to work on an ARM chip.
--- Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
>
> [ Jeff: is that PCI ROM enable _really_ that complicated? Ouch. Or is
> there some helper function I missed? ]
>
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Jon Smirl wrote:
> >
> > I don't think DRM drivers are doing things correctly yet. DRM is missing
> the
> > code for marking PCI resources as being in use while DRM is using them.
> This
> > could lead to problems with hotplug. XFree is also mapping PCI ROMs in
> without
> > informing the kernel and that can definitely cause problems.
>
> Absolutely. Changing PCI configurations without telling the kernel _will_
> cause problems. Especially for hotplug systems, but it's also very iffy to
> do if the card is behind a PCI bridge, since you have to take bridge
> resources into account (and know which bridges are transparent, which are
> not, etc etc).
>
> The kernel spends a lot of effort on getting this right, and even so it
> fails every once in a while (devices that use IO or memory regions without
> announcing them in the standard BAR's are quite common, and the kernel has
> to have special quirk entries for things like that).
>
> Few enough drivers actually want to enable the roms, but the code should
> look something like
>
> /* Assign space for ROM resource if not already assigned. Ugly. */
> if (!pci_resource_start(dev, PCI_ROM_RESOURCE))
> if (pci_assign_resource(dev, PCI_ROM_RESOURCE) < 0)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> /* Enable it. This is too ugly */
> if (!(pci_resource_flags(dev, PCI_ROM_RESOURCE) & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE)) {
> u32 val;
> pci_read_config_dword(dev, PCI_ROM_ADDRESS, &val);
> val |= PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE;
> pci_write_config_dword(dev, PCI_ROM_ADDRESS, val);
> pci_resource_flags(dev, PCI_ROM_RESOURCE) |= PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE;
> }
>
>
> /* Enable the device, and regular resources */
> if (pci_enable_device(dev))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> pci_set_master(dev); /* If we want to */
> pci_set_mwi(dev); /* If we want to */
>
> (Yeah, that is more complex than it really should need to be. That's just
> a sign of exactly how few device drivers tend to want to do this: the
> usual helper stuff is all geared for the normal case).
>
> > new style probe
> > if (new probe has device)
> > mark resources in use
>
> You shouldn't need to mark the resources in use. Just registering the
> driver should do everything for you, including making sure that no other
> driver will register that device.
>
> Of course, if you are worried about mixing with drivers that use the old
> "find device and just use it", then yes, you'll need to mark the resources
> in use. That can be as trivial as just doing a
>
> if (pci_request_regions(dev, "drivername") < 0)
> return -EAIIEEEE!;
>
> in the probe function (but then you need to remember to release them in
> the drop function).
>
> Linus
>
The framebuffer drivers are doing it like this. Should they be replaced with
pci_request_regions?
/* request the mem regions */
if (!request_mem_region (rinfo->fb_base_phys,
pci_resource_len(pdev, 0), "radeonfb")) {
printk (KERN_ERR "radeonfb: cannot reserve FB region\n");
goto free_rinfo;
}
if (!request_mem_region (rinfo->mmio_base_phys,
pci_resource_len(pdev, 2), "radeonfb")) {
printk (KERN_ERR "radeonfb: cannot reserve MMIO region\n");
goto release_fb;
}
=====
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@yahoo.com
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new
features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-24 1:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1066703516.646.24.camel@leguin>
2003-10-23 19:04 ` DRM and pci_driver conversion Kronos
2003-10-23 21:10 ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Eric Anholt
2003-10-23 21:31 ` Jon Smirl
2003-10-23 23:23 ` [Dri-devel] " Linus Torvalds
2003-10-23 23:46 ` Eric Anholt
2003-10-24 1:19 ` [Dri-devel] " Jeff Garzik
2003-10-24 1:52 ` [Dri-devel] Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Jon Smirl
2003-10-24 3:47 ` Multiple drivers for same hardware:, was: " Jon Smirl
2003-10-24 4:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-28 18:00 ` James Simmons
2003-10-24 16:44 ` [Dri-devel] " Linus Torvalds
2003-10-24 16:57 ` [Dri-devel] Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Petr Vandrovec
2003-10-24 17:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-24 18:34 ` Jon Smirl
2003-10-24 19:45 ` [Dri-devel] " Ivan Kokshaysky
2003-10-24 19:08 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2003-10-24 17:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-10-24 1:50 ` Jon Smirl [this message]
2003-10-25 17:29 ` Egbert Eich
2003-10-25 18:37 ` [Dri-devel] Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Linus Torvalds
2003-10-25 19:17 ` [Dri-devel] " Jeff Garzik
2003-10-27 14:37 ` Ingo Oeser
2003-10-27 15:14 ` Keith Whitwell
2003-10-27 15:38 ` Jeff Garzik
[not found] ` <20031027153824.GA19711@gtf.org>
2003-10-27 15:50 ` Keith Whitwell
[not found] ` <200310271537.30435.ioe-lkml@rameria.de>
2003-10-27 15:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-10-28 10:53 ` [Dri-devel] Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Ingo Oeser
2003-10-25 21:02 ` [Dri-devel] " Jon Smirl
2003-10-25 22:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-10-27 15:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-10-27 15:10 ` Keith Whitwell
[not found] ` <20031027114006.A66611@xfree86.org>
2003-10-27 19:38 ` Ian Romanick
2003-10-27 21:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-27 23:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-10-28 2:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-28 3:27 ` Philip Brown
2003-10-28 19:40 ` James Simmons
2003-10-28 21:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-10-28 22:09 ` Jon Smirl
2003-10-28 22:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-10-28 22:54 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031024015004.16330.qmail@web14913.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=jonsmirl@yahoo.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=eta@lclark.edu \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=kronos@kronoz.cjb.net \
--cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).