From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
To: linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Screen Refresh
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 16:02:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040505140257.GI29503@lug-owl.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200405051047.00127.lucasvr@gobolinux.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1486 bytes --]
On Wed, 2004-05-05 10:47:00 -0300, Lucas Correia Villa Real <lucasvr@gobolinux.org>
wrote in message <200405051047.00127.lucasvr@gobolinux.org>:
> I'm writing a device driver for a monochrome LCD display managed by a
> controller that will be plugged into the CPU through a SPI, that is, I cannot
> directly memory-map it's address, since the communication will be done via
> a serial interface.
So I see two ways.
If you only want to be able to output text, then you'd register
as a console device. You'll then get write accesses, which you can then
promote to real hardware.
If you really want to provide a graphical display, you'll need
something like two buffers (one the kernel writes to, probably a 2nd one
to store the "current" image to only send down the changed pixels).
That'll come along with some timed function - not nice, but may work.
In theory, you'd try to not actually provide a framebuffer (memory), but
to simply give pointers to all those accelerated functions. If you've
got enough luck, you'll only see these functions called, so that you can
do graphics with merely no overhead of polling the whole memory...
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak!
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-05 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-05 13:47 Screen Refresh Lucas Correia Villa Real
2004-05-05 14:02 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw [this message]
2004-05-05 15:46 ` Lucas Correia Villa Real
2004-05-15 13:58 ` [ PATCH-LINK ] fb accel capabilities - take 2 David Eger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040505140257.GI29503@lug-owl.de \
--to=jbglaw@lug-owl.de \
--cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).