Sun Blade 100 with 2 pgx64 (ATi Mach64 ?) framebuffers (fwd)

Sun Blade 100 with 2 pgx64 (ATi Mach64 ?) framebuffers (fwd)

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 16:11:30 +0200
From: Admar Schoonen <admar@luon.net>
To: geert@linux-m68k.org
Subject: Sun Blade 100 with 2 pgx64 (ATi Mach64 ?) framebuffers

Dear Geert Uytterhoeven,

I have a Sun Blade 100 ultra sparc with 2 pgx64 framebuffers, one on
board and one pci. The machine is running an up to date Debian GNU/Linux
unstable. With linux 2.4.24, both cards work fine (I can move consoles
around with con2fbmap and XFree86 sees 2 cards and starts an X server on
both screens (I haven't tried xinerama though)).

With 2.6.6, this doesn't work anymore. dmesg output seems good:
$ dmesg |grep -i aty
atyfb: 3D RAGE (XL) [0x4752 rev 0x27] 8M SDRAM, 29.498928 MHz XTAL, 230
MHz PLL, 100 Mhz MCLK
fb0: ATY Mach64 frame buffer device on PCI
atyfb: 3D RAGE (XL) [0x4752 rev 0x27] 8M SGRAM, 29.498928 MHz XTAL, 230
MHz PLL, 100 Mhz MCLK

but the second head stays black if I try to move consoles. Also, XFree86
only sees my onboard card.

I don't know how I should debug this issue, but I hope you can give me
some clues.

Best regards

Admar Schoonen
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 16:18:51 +0200
From: Admar Schoonen <admar@luon.net>
To: geert@linux-m68k.org
Subject: Sun Blade 100 with 2 pgx64 (ATi Mach64 ?) framebuffers

Hi Geert Uytterhoeven,

Sorry, but I forgot to add that I had to apply a small patch to 2.6 to
make it recognize the on board pgx64 in first place. The patch is a one
liner to get around the fact that XFree86 not knowing the new 2.6 pci
device naming scheme, and I don't think it is causing the problem I have
with 2 pgx64 framebuffers.

The patch is at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2004/02/msg00013.html

Best regards

Admar


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to 
deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3

Re: Sun Blade 100 with 2 pgx64 (ATi Mach64 ?) framebuffers (fwd)

[Admar Schoonen]

Dear linux-fbdev developers,

About a week ago, Geert Uytterhoeven forwarded 2 e-mails from me to this
list. Since I haven't received any replies yet, and since the (public)
archives at
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=linux-fbdev-devel
don't show my post yet (in fact, they don't show anything more recent
than april 4, 2004), I was wondering if anyone already replied to the
list and forgot to CC to me.

If anyone already replied, could someone please send those replies to
me? And if nobody has replied, does anyone have a clue on how to get
dual head consoles working with 2.6(.6) on an ultra sparc (or, if it's
broken, where I should start looking to find the actual problem)?

Best regards

Admar Schoonen

On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 04:20:37PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 16:11:30 +0200
> From: Admar Schoonen <admar@luon.net>
> To: geert@linux-m68k.org
> Subject: Sun Blade 100 with 2 pgx64 (ATi Mach64 ?) framebuffers
> 
> Dear Geert Uytterhoeven,
> 
> I have a Sun Blade 100 ultra sparc with 2 pgx64 framebuffers, one on
> board and one pci. The machine is running an up to date Debian GNU/Linux
> unstable. With linux 2.4.24, both cards work fine (I can move consoles
> around with con2fbmap and XFree86 sees 2 cards and starts an X server on
> both screens (I haven't tried xinerama though)).
> 
> With 2.6.6, this doesn't work anymore. dmesg output seems good:
> $ dmesg |grep -i aty
> atyfb: 3D RAGE (XL) [0x4752 rev 0x27] 8M SDRAM, 29.498928 MHz XTAL, 230
> MHz PLL, 100 Mhz MCLK
> fb0: ATY Mach64 frame buffer device on PCI
> atyfb: 3D RAGE (XL) [0x4752 rev 0x27] 8M SGRAM, 29.498928 MHz XTAL, 230
> MHz PLL, 100 Mhz MCLK
> 
> but the second head stays black if I try to move consoles. Also, XFree86
> only sees my onboard card.
> 
> I don't know how I should debug this issue, but I hope you can give me
> some clues.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Admar Schoonen
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 16:18:51 +0200
> From: Admar Schoonen <admar@luon.net>
> To: geert@linux-m68k.org
> Subject: Sun Blade 100 with 2 pgx64 (ATi Mach64 ?) framebuffers
> 
> Hi Geert Uytterhoeven,
> 
> Sorry, but I forgot to add that I had to apply a small patch to 2.6 to
> make it recognize the on board pgx64 in first place. The patch is a one
> liner to get around the fact that XFree86 not knowing the new 2.6 pci
> device naming scheme, and I don't think it is causing the problem I have
> with 2 pgx64 framebuffers.
> 
> The patch is at
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2004/02/msg00013.html
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Admar


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband
Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest
6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click

Re: Re: Sun Blade 100 with 2 pgx64 (ATi Mach64 ?) framebuffers (fwd)

[Alexander Kern]

Am Montag, 17. Mai 2004 21:32 schrieb Admar Schoonen:
> Dear linux-fbdev developers,
>
> About a week ago, Geert Uytterhoeven forwarded 2 e-mails from me to this
> list. Since I haven't received any replies yet, and since the (public)
Hello, I trying to maintan atyfb driver in 2.6.x, unfortunately I can't to 
probe with two cards, all my examples of Mach64 are AGP cards. Please
wait before James submit new atyfb driver to main tree. Very soon;-) This 
driver is a port of latest 2.4.x and and with little luck you will get both 
working.

P.S. James, your site http://www.infradead.org/~jsimmons is still empty !!!
Regards Alex




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click