From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: Generic VESA framebuffer driver and Video card BOOT? Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 01:00:27 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20041021230027.GA24762@elf.ucw.cz> References: <88056F38E9E48644A0F562A38C64FB600328792F@scsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <88056F38E9E48644A0F562A38C64FB600328792F@scsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> List-Id: Cc: Kendall Bennett , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Hi! > >The rest of the code you have above seems superfluous to me as we have > >never needed to do that. Then again we boot the card using the BIOS > >emulator, which is different because it runs within a > >protected machine > >state. > > > >Have you taken a look at the X.org code? They have code in > >there to POST > >the video card also (either using vm86() or the BIOS emulator). > > > > I have done some experiments with this video post stuff. > I think this should be done using x86 emulator rather than doing > in real mode. The reason being, with an userlevel emulator we can call > it at different times during resume. The current real mode videopost > does Actually Ole Rohne has patch that allows you to call real mode any time you want. Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!