* [2.6 patch] sstfb.c: make some code static
@ 2004-11-21 15:36 Adrian Bunk
2004-11-24 22:49 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2004-11-21 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ghozlane Toumi; +Cc: Antonino Daplas, linux-kernel, linux-fbdev-devel
The patch below makes some needlessly global code static.
diffstat output:
drivers/video/sstfb.c | 11 +++++++----
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
--- linux-2.6.10-rc2-mm2-full/drivers/video/sstfb.c.old 2004-11-21 14:59:23.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc2-mm2-full/drivers/video/sstfb.c 2004-11-21 16:02:43.000000000 +0100
@@ -1338,8 +1338,8 @@
/*
* Interface to the world
*/
-
-int __init sstfb_setup(char *options)
+#ifndef MODULE
+static int __init sstfb_setup(char *options)
{
char *this_opt;
@@ -1372,6 +1372,7 @@
}
return 0;
}
+#endif
static struct fb_ops sstfb_ops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
@@ -1565,7 +1566,7 @@
};
-int __devinit sstfb_init(void)
+static int __devinit sstfb_init(void)
{
#ifndef MODULE
char *option = NULL;
@@ -1577,10 +1578,12 @@
return pci_module_init(&sstfb_driver);
}
-void __devexit sstfb_exit(void)
+#ifdef MODULE
+static void __devexit sstfb_exit(void)
{
pci_unregister_driver(&sstfb_driver);
}
+#endif
/*
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [2.6 patch] sstfb.c: make some code static
2004-11-21 15:36 Adrian Bunk
@ 2004-11-24 22:49 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-25 15:36 ` Adrian Bunk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2004-11-24 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Bunk
Cc: Ghozlane Toumi, Antonino Daplas, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linux-fbdev-devel
On Sul, 2004-11-21 at 15:36, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The patch below makes some needlessly global code static.
No it doesn't. It makes some functions static (which is fine) and adds
some nasty messy pointless #ifdefs. It touches no variable at all.
Please check your description texts and also don't fill the kernel with
ifdef crap. Probably the __setup stuff should be a module param new
style too.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [2.6 patch] sstfb.c: make some code static
2004-11-24 22:49 ` Alan Cox
@ 2004-11-25 15:36 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-25 16:50 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2004-11-25 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox
Cc: Ghozlane Toumi, Antonino Daplas, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linux-fbdev-devel
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 10:49:47PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sul, 2004-11-21 at 15:36, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The patch below makes some needlessly global code static.
>
> No it doesn't. It makes some functions static (which is fine) and adds
> some nasty messy pointless #ifdefs. It touches no variable at all.
>
> Please check your description texts and also don't fill the kernel with
> ifdef crap. Probably the __setup stuff should be a module param new
> style too.
Yes, the description text could have been better.
The "ifdef crap" comes from the fact, that after making the functions
static, gcc warns if they are unused.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [2.6 patch] sstfb.c: make some code static
2004-11-25 15:36 ` Adrian Bunk
@ 2004-11-25 16:50 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2004-11-25 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Bunk
Cc: Ghozlane Toumi, Antonino Daplas, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linux-fbdev-devel
On Iau, 2004-11-25 at 15:36, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The "ifdef crap" comes from the fact, that after making the functions
> static, gcc warns if they are unused.
__attribute__ is your friend in that situation.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [2.6 patch] sstfb.c: make some code static
@ 2005-02-11 18:54 Adrian Bunk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2005-02-11 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Ghozlane Toumi, Antonino Daplas, linux-kernel, linux-fbdev-devel
This patch below makes some needlessly global code static.
Additionally, it adds #ifdefs for code only used in the
modular/nonmodular cases.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
---
This patch was already sent on:
- 21 Nov 2004
drivers/video/sstfb.c | 11 +++++++----
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.10-rc2-mm2-full/drivers/video/sstfb.c.old 2004-11-21 14:59:23.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc2-mm2-full/drivers/video/sstfb.c 2004-11-21 16:02:43.000000000 +0100
@@ -1338,8 +1338,8 @@
/*
* Interface to the world
*/
-
-int __init sstfb_setup(char *options)
+#ifndef MODULE
+static int __init sstfb_setup(char *options)
{
char *this_opt;
@@ -1372,6 +1372,7 @@
}
return 0;
}
+#endif
static struct fb_ops sstfb_ops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
@@ -1565,7 +1566,7 @@
};
-int __devinit sstfb_init(void)
+static int __devinit sstfb_init(void)
{
#ifndef MODULE
char *option = NULL;
@@ -1577,10 +1578,12 @@
return pci_module_init(&sstfb_driver);
}
-void __devexit sstfb_exit(void)
+#ifdef MODULE
+static void __devexit sstfb_exit(void)
{
pci_unregister_driver(&sstfb_driver);
}
+#endif
/*
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-02-11 18:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-02-11 18:54 [2.6 patch] sstfb.c: make some code static Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-21 15:36 Adrian Bunk
2004-11-24 22:49 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-25 15:36 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-25 16:50 ` Alan Cox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).